Stress on implant-supported fixed prostheses with different numbers of abutments after the application of acrylic resin

被引:0
作者
Palmeiro, Marina Rechden Lobato [1 ]
de Barcellos, Leonardo Hoffmann [2 ]
Naconecy, Marcos
Geremia, Tomas [1 ]
Cervieri, Andre [3 ]
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Prosthodont, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Postgrad Program Dent, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Luterana Brasil, Dept Engn, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
IN-VIVO; BRANEMARK IMPLANTS; FRAMEWORK ALLOY; BIOMECHANICS; MISFIT; FORCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Clinical procedures and laboratory processing techniques inevitably induce stress in the implant/abutment/prosthesis system and may have negative effects when different numbers of implants are used. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the tension on the abutments of implant-supported fixed prostheses and to determine the effect of the application of an esthetic veneer (acrylic resin) and the number of abutments (5 or 4). Material and methods. Four palladium-silver alloy cast bars were fabricated to simulate implant-supported fixed complete prostheses. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments to measure the tension before and after the application of the esthetic veneer. The values of tension were measured in models with 5 or 4 abutments. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA. Results. No statistically significant differences were found for the main factors (esthetic veneer, P=.22; number of abutments, P=.14) despite the large effect size. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the tension in the abutments of an implant-supported fixed prosthesis is not affected by the application of acrylic resin veneering or by reducing the number of abutments.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW
    ADELL, R
    LEKHOLM, U
    ROCKLER, B
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06): : 387 - 416
  • [2] Biomechanics Studies in Dentistry: Bioengineering Applied in Oral Implantology
    Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    Tabala, Lucas Fernando
    Gomes, Erica Alves
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    dos Santos, Paulo Henrique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (04) : 1173 - 1177
  • [3] Bassit R, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P17
  • [4] Early functional loading at 5 days for Branemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: A prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study
    Becker, W
    Becker, BE
    Huffstetler, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (05) : 695 - 702
  • [5] 10-YEAR SURVIVAL RATES OF FIXED PROSTHESES ON 4 OR 6 IMPLANTS AD-MODUM BRANEMARK IN FULL EDENTULISM
    BRANEMARK, PI
    SVENSSON, B
    VANSTEENBERGHE, D
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1995, 6 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [6] OSSEOINTEGRATION AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (03) : 399 - 410
  • [7] Chee W, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P137
  • [8] Çiftçi Y, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P571
  • [9] Davis D M, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P197
  • [10] Davis D M, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P275