Influence of the mean period of ground motion on the inelastic dynamic response of single and multi degree of freedom systems

被引:39
|
作者
Kumar, M. [1 ]
Castro, J. M. [1 ]
Stafford, P. J. [1 ]
Elghazouli, A. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, England
关键词
seismic response; moment frames; nonlinear analysis; Eurocode; 8; DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN; SOFT SOIL SITES; SEISMIC DESIGN; RATIOS; SPECTRA; EPSILON;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.1013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on examining the effects of frequency content of the ground motion on the inelastic demands imposed on both single degree of freedom (SDF) and multi degree of freedom (MDF) steel-framed systems. A detailed literature review is conducted to identify the indicator that best represents the frequency content of ground motion. The mean period (T-m) of ground motion is selected owing to its ability to distinguish between various spectral shapes of ground motion, and its relationship with magnitude, distance and site characteristics. Inelastic displacement demands on SDF systems for target ductility levels are first studied in the light of T-m, using a suite of 128 ground motion records. The study is then extended to MDF systems with the help of incremental dynamic analysis by employing the same ground motion ensemble to assess the influence of T-m on various engineering demand parameters. The results obtained indicate that, for SDF systems, the amplification of displacements occurs when the period ratio between elastic period (T-e) and T-m is lower than unity. For MDF systems, the results demonstrate that the influence of higher modes on the base shear and maximum storey drift profile becomes more pronounced, as T-m approaches the higher mode periods of the structure. These observations, for both SDF and MDF systems, tend to be more evident for higher levels of inelasticity. The significance of the results, with particular reference to European seismic design procedures, is highlighted. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 256
页数:20
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Estimating Fundamental Dynamic Properties of Structures with Supplemental Dampers by Means of Generalized Single Degree of Freedom Systems
    Palermo, Michele
    Laghi, Vittoria
    Gasparini, Giada
    Silvestri, Stefano
    Trombetti, Tomaso
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (07) : 3769 - 3798
  • [12] Toward Optimizing Dynamic Characteristics of Non-conventional TMDs in Multi-degree-of-Freedom Systems
    Yahyai, Mahmood
    Zebarjad, Leila
    Head, Monique
    Shokouhian, Mehdi
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 44 (SUPPL 1) : 205 - 215
  • [13] Evaluation of the Response of Posttensioned Steel Frames with Energy Dissipators Using Equivalent Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
    Rivera, J. Luz
    Lopez-Barraza, Arturo
    Ruiz, Sonia E.
    Reyes-Salazar, Alfredo
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [14] Influence of vertical ground motion on the seismic response of underground structures and underground-aboveground structure systems in liquefiable ground
    Wang, Rui
    Zhu, Tong
    Yu, Jia-Ke
    Zhang, Jian-Min
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 122
  • [15] Influence of the Vertical Component of Yangbi Ground Motion on the Dynamic Response of RC Frame and Brick-Concrete Structure
    Wang, Hongwei
    Jia, Mingming
    Yao, Yanwu
    Chen, Xueliang
    Zhang, Zirong
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [16] Influence of the characteristics of isolation and mitigation devices on the response of single-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact systems with two-sided bumpers and gaps via shaking table tests
    Andreaus, Ugo
    De Angelis, Maurizio
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2020, 27 (05)
  • [17] Parametric study and prediction models of the seismic response of single-degree-of-freedom structural systems equipped with Maxwell material fluid viscous dampers
    Chalarca, Bryan
    Filiatrault, Andre
    Perrone, Daniele
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 43 : 388 - 406