What is the best time to evaluate treatment response after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced sonography?

被引:19
作者
Zhou, Pei [2 ]
Kudo, Masatoshi [1 ]
Minami, Yasunori [1 ]
Chung, Hobyung [1 ]
Inoue, Tatsuo [1 ]
Fukunaga, Toyokazu [1 ]
Maekawa, Kiyoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Osaka 5898511, Japan
[2] Wuhan Gen Hosp Guangzhou Mil Area, Dept Ultrasound, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Abdominal Ultrasound Unit, Osaka, Japan
关键词
radiofrequency ablation; tumor boundary; hepatic tumor; gray-scale sonography; safety margin;
D O I
10.1159/000111713
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To observe the visibility and changes in the echogenicity of ablated tumor and ablated nontumor areas after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) over time using gray-scale sonography, and, consequently, to decide on the best timing for contrast-enhanced sonography to evaluate the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to RFA. Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight patients with 48 hepatocellular carcinoma nodules underwent RFA. Consecutive gray-scale sonographic observations were made 10 min before RFA and at five points within 4 days after RFA. Two hepatologists blindly reviewed the sonographic images to assess the identifiability of the boundary of the ablated nodules and to semiquantitatively score the echogenicity of the ablated tumor and ablated nontumor regions in 15 hypoechoic nodules with detectable boundaries within 4 days after RFA. Results: The detection rates of the boundaries of ablated tumors were 56.5, 65.2, 54.3, 43.5, and 39.1% at 3-6 h and 15-22 h and on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th days after RFA. There was a significant difference between the detection rate for ablated tumors at 15-22 h and that on the 3rd and 4th days. The difference in echogenicity between ablated tumor and ablated nontumor tissue reached a maximum at 15-22 h after RFA. Conclusion: Ablated tumor can be clearly identified within the ablated area in 65.2% of cases using gray-scale sonography at 15-22 h after RFA. The day following RFA is most appropriate and practical for the performance of contrast-enhanced sonography to evaluate the therapeutic response, including a safety margin.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
CASTELLS A, 1993, HEPATOLOGY, V18, P1121
[2]   Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: Usefulness of power Doppler US with a microbubble contrast agent in evaluating therapeutic response-preliminary results [J].
Choi, D ;
Lim, HK ;
Kim, SH ;
Lee, WJ ;
Jang, HJ ;
Lee, JY ;
Paik, SW ;
Koh, KC ;
Lee, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) :558-563
[3]   Ultrasound contrast agents:: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts [J].
Correas, JM ;
Bridal, L ;
Lesavre, A ;
Méjean, A ;
Claudon, M ;
Hélénon, O .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (08) :1316-1328
[4]   Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up [J].
Dromain, C ;
de Baere, T ;
Elias, D ;
Kuoch, V ;
Ducreux, M ;
Boige, V ;
Petrow, P ;
Roche, A ;
Sigal, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) :255-262
[5]   Tumor ablation with radio-frequency energy [J].
Gazelle, GS ;
Goldberg, SN ;
Solbiati, L ;
Livraghi, T .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (03) :633-646
[6]   Ablation of liver tumors using percutaneous RF therapy [J].
Goldberg, SN ;
Gazelle, GS ;
Solbiati, L ;
Livraghi, T ;
Tanabe, KK ;
Hahn, PF ;
Mueller, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (04) :1023-1028
[7]   Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: the JIS score compared with the CLIP score [J].
Kudo, M ;
Chung, HY ;
Haji, S ;
Osaki, Y ;
Oka, H ;
Seki, T ;
Kasugai, H ;
Sasaki, Y ;
Matsunaga, T .
HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 40 (06) :1396-1405
[8]   Local ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives [J].
Kudo, M .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 39 (03) :205-214
[9]   Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection [J].
Lencioni, RA ;
Allgaier, HP ;
Cioni, D ;
Olschewski, M ;
Deibert, P ;
Crocetti, L ;
Frings, H ;
Laubenberger, J ;
Zuber, I ;
Blum, HE ;
Bartolozzi, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :235-240
[10]  
Lim H K, 2000, Korean J Radiol, V1, P175