Towards the integration of urban planning and biodiversity conservation through collaboration

被引:2
作者
Wood, Greg [1 ]
Whyatt, Duncan [1 ]
Stevens, Carly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
关键词
Collaborative GIS; Commercial ecology; Ecological legislation; Development site; Planning; Biodiversity; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; GIS; URBANIZATION; COMMUNITIES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eti.2015.08.002
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Despite aspirations to halt biodiversity loss by 2020 under the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, urban development continues to negatively impact UK wildlife and habitats. Reasons behind continued biodiversity decline are examined through the use of semi-structured interviews with ecologists, statutory regulators and land developers. It is found that despite strict legislation and best practice, for both planning and ecology, there is still much room for subjectivity regarding the protection of specific ecological features and the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy. Interviews also revealed that such subjectivity often facilitates the prioritisation of commercial over ecological benefits during site design. Furthermore, many felt an over reliance on the protection of individual animals, as opposed to maintaining functional connectivity for conservation of wider populations was detrimental to both the development industry and ecology. Our findings support the case for further research into the development of innovative geographical information systems to allow spatial deliberation, and collaborative decision-making between the three stakeholder groups. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 226
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Collaborative governance in theory and practice
    Ansell, Chris
    Gash, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) : 543 - 571
  • [2] Ball I.R., 2009, Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation
  • [3] Balram S, 2006, COLLABORATIVE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1
  • [4] Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas
    Banks, Peter B.
    Bryant, Jessica V.
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 3 (06) : 611 - 613
  • [5] Brinkmann S., 2015, InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, V3
  • [6] CIEEM, 2006, GUID EC IMP ASS UK
  • [7] Coleridge N, 2013, TELEGRAPH
  • [8] Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011, STRAT PLAN BIOD 2011
  • [9] A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures
    Coutinho-Rodrigues, Joao
    Simao, Ana
    Antunes, Carlos Henggeler
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (03) : 720 - 726
  • [10] Dale VH, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P639