Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy

被引:15
作者
Kampers, J. [1 ]
Gerhardt, E. [1 ]
Sibbertsen, P. [2 ]
Flock, T. [2 ]
Hertel, H. [1 ]
Klapdor, R. [1 ]
Jentschke, M. [1 ]
Hillemanns, P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Fac Econ & Management, Hannover, Germany
[3] Comprehens Canc Ctr Niedersachsen CCC N, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Early cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Minimally-invasive; Laparoscopy; Robot-assisted; Postoperative morbidity; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER; RECURRENCE; LAPAROTOMY; SURGERY; IB;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-021-06248-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for early cervical cancer. Studies have shown superior oncological outcome for open versus minimal invasive surgery, but peri- and postoperative complication rates were shown vice versa. This meta-analysis evaluates the peri- and postoperative morbidities and complications of robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared to open surgery. Methods Embase and Ovid-Medline databases were systematically searched in June 2020 for studies comparing robotic, laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy. There was no limitation in publication year. Inclusion criteria were set analogue to the LACC trial. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding the operative technique, the study design and the date of publication for the endpoints intra- and postoperative morbidity, estimated blood loss, hospital stay and operation time. Results 27 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five prospective, randomized-control trials were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference between robotic radical hysterectomy (RH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) concerning intra- and perioperative complications. Operation time was longer in both RH (mean difference 44.79 min [95% CI 38.16; 51.42]), and LH (mean difference 20.96 min; [95% CI - 1.30; 43.22]) than in open hysterectomy (AH) but did not lead to a rise of intra- and postoperative complications. Intraoperative morbidity was lower in LH than in AH (RR 0.90 [0.80; 1.02]) as well as in RH compared to AH (0.54 [0.33; 0.88]). Intraoperative morbidity showed no difference between LH and RH (RR 1.29 [0.23; 7.29]). Postoperative morbidity was not different in any approach. Estimated blood loss was lower in both LH (mean difference - 114.34 [- 122.97; - 105.71]) and RH (mean difference - 287.14 [- 392.99; - 181.28]) compared to AH, respectively. Duration of hospital stay was shorter for LH (mean difference - 3.06 [- 3.28; - 2.83]) and RH (mean difference - 3.77 [- 5.10; - 2.44]) compared to AH. Conclusion Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy appears to be associated with reduced intraoperative morbidity and blood loss and improved reconvalescence after surgery. Besides oncological and surgical factors these results should be considered when counseling patients for radical hysterectomy and underscore the need for new randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 314
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Biere, S. S. A. Y.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    Van Der Peet, D. L.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2009, 64 (02) : 121 - 133
  • [32] Minimally invasive versus open central pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Mowbray, Nicholas George
    Mortimer, Matthew
    Shingler, Guy
    Kambal, Amir
    Al-Sarireh, Bilal
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2024, 28 (04) : 412 - 422
  • [33] A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
    Sun, Si
    Cai, Jing
    Li, Ruixie
    Wang, Yujia
    Zhao, Jing
    Huang, Yuhui
    Xu, Linjuan
    Yang, Qiang
    Wang, Zehua
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (03) : 623 - 637
  • [34] Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Zhang, Hang
    Wu, XiangHu
    Zhu, Feng
    Shen, Ming
    Tian, Rui
    Shi, ChengJian
    Wang, Xin
    Xiao, GuangQin
    Guo, XingJun
    Wang, Min
    Qin, RenYi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (12): : 5173 - 5184
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Pasanisi, Francesca
    Molitierno, Rossella
    Iavarone, Irene
    Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
    De Franciscis, Pasquale
    Conte, Carmine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [36] Minimally invasive versus open living donors right hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Lei, Zehua
    Gao, Fengwei
    Yang, Jie
    Xie, Qingyun
    Jiang, Kangyi
    Jie, Gong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 95
  • [37] Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xia, Ning
    Li, Jiao
    Wang, Qiang
    Huang, Xing
    Wang, Zihe
    Wang, Li
    Tian, Bole
    Xiong, Junjie
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (07): : 3531 - 3546
  • [38] Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, SiCong
    Chen, Liang
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [39] Meta-Analysis of Trials Comparing Minimally-Invasive and Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Fancellu, Alessandro
    Rosman, Alan S.
    Sanna, Valeria
    Nigri, Giuseppe R.
    Zorcolo, Luigi
    Pisano, Michele
    Melis, Marcovalerio
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 171 (01) : E33 - E45
  • [40] Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups
    Johanna Kampers
    E. Gerhardt
    P. Sibbertsen
    T. Flock
    R. Klapdor
    H. Hertel
    M. Jentschke
    P. Hillemanns
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 577 - 587