Impact of hypoxic and mesopic environments on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and accommodation in subjects with LASIK surgery and aircrew candidate

被引:2
作者
Lin, Hsin-Ting [1 ]
Chan, Hui-Ju [2 ]
Ho, Cheng-Wen [2 ]
Tai, Ming-Cheng [1 ]
Chen, Jiann-Torng [1 ]
Liang, Chang-Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Triserv Gen Hosp, Natl Def Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Def Med Ctr, Grad Inst Aerosp & Undersea Med, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Accommodation; Aircrew safety; Contrast sensitivity; Hypoxic; LASIK surgery; Mesopic environment; Visual acuity; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; FEMTOSECOND LASER; DARK-ADAPTATION; MICROKERATOME; LUMINANCE; OXYGENATION; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcma.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The safety of Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in aircrew was unclear, in addition, LASIK was not yet approved for aircrew of Taiwan Air Force. This study was aimed to evaluate visual performance in LASIK eyes in hypoxic and twilight environment. Methods: 48 myopic eyes of 24 subjects enrolled in this study were divided into LASIK group and control group. Subjects were exposed in hypoxic (15% O-2) and mesopic (3 cd/m(2)) environment. Visual performance was evaluated using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual chart, and Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT) before and after the expirement. Physiological parameters of all subjects were measured and recorded throughout the experiment. Results: There was no significant difference of the two groups regarding their age, height, weight, and BMI. There is significant difference of preoperative spherical refractive error between the two groups. The results of physiological parameters were similar between two groups. Under normoxic conditions, there were no significant difference regarding distant vision in photopic and mesopic environments, so as for near vision. As a whole, the contrast sensitivity of the LASIK group were lowered than that of the control group about 35%, under whether normoxic or hypoxic conditions; photopic or mesopic circumstances. Under normoxic conditions, the measured accommodation of the LASIK group were 21% lowered than that of the control group and 31% lowered under hypoxic circumstances. Conclusion: There was no significant difference of visual acuity between the two groups regarding hypoxic and mesopic environment, but reduced contrast sensitivity was significant in LASIK group as compared to those of the control group. Accommodation was significantly lowered in LASIK group, compared with control group, in hypoxic environment. Whether postoperative visual performance after LASIK in aircrew during flying duty is safe might need further investigation. Copyright (C) 2018, the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1007
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Stability of Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) at Altitude [J].
Aaron, Michelle ;
Wright, Steve ;
Gooch, John ;
Harvey, Rich ;
Davis, Ryan ;
Reilly, Charles .
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2012, 83 (10) :958-961
[2]   IntraLase Femtosecond Laser vs Mechanical Microkeratomes in LASIK for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Shihao ;
Feng, Yifan ;
Stojanovic, Aleksandar ;
Jankov, Mirko R., II ;
Wang, Qinmei .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (01) :15-24
[3]   Aviation-related respiratory gas disturbances affect dark adaptation: A reappraisal [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. ;
Hosking, Sarah L. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (11) :1784-1793
[4]   Oxygenation State and Twilight Vision at 2438 m [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. .
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2011, 82 (01) :2-8
[5]   Spatial Contrast Sensitivity at Twilight: Luminance, Monocularity, and Oxygenation [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. .
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 81 (05) :475-483
[6]   Low Contrast Acuity at Photopic and Mesopic Luminance Under Mild Hypoxia, Normoxia, and Hyperoxia [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. ;
Barbur, John L. .
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 80 (11) :933-940
[7]  
Davis RM, 2007, J REFRACT SURG, V23, P563
[8]  
Fazel Farhad, 2017, Adv Biomed Res, V6, P149, DOI 10.4103/abr.abr_241_15
[9]  
Hashmani S, 2017, CLIN OPHTHALMOL, V11, P1009, DOI 10.2147/OPTH.S137451
[10]   ANOXIA AND BRIGHTNESS DISCRIMINATION [J].
HECHT, S ;
HENDLEY, CD ;
FRANK, SR ;
HAIG, C .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1946, 29 (05) :335-351