Considering dynamic Pareto frontiers in decision making

被引:5
作者
Lewis, Patrick K. [1 ]
Tackett, Morgan W. P. [1 ]
Mattson, Christopher A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Provo, UT 84602 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multiobjective optimization; s-Pareto frontier; Dynamic multiobjective problem formulation; Decision making; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTS; TRAVERSE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11081-013-9238-2
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Considering how the resolution of conflicts changes over time is an aspect of multiobjective optimization that is not commonly explored. These considerations embody changes in both the preferences that dictate the selection of Pareto designs, and changes in the Pareto frontier itself over time, or s-Pareto frontier when a set of disparate design concepts are considered. As such, this paper explores the idea of dynamic s-Pareto frontiers and preferences. Specifically, this paper presents a dynamic multiobjective optimization problem formulation that provides a framework of identifying the s-Pareto frontier for a series of time steps. The application of the presented dynamic formulation is illustrated through a simple aircraft design example. Through this example it was observed that the identification of the dynamic s-Pareto frontier enabled the observation of the impact of design decisions on the offset of selected designs from the identified dynamic frontier. By measuring and minimizing the aircraft design offset, the selected aircraft design offset was improved by an average of roughly 60 % from the next best selected alternative identified using traditional selection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 854
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P 8 ANN C GEN EV COM
[2]  
Blackwell T, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3005, P489
[3]  
Bowman MW, 1999, LOCKHEED C 130, P4
[4]   Multiobjective optimization of structures with and without control [J].
Cheng, FY ;
Li, D .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1996, 19 (02) :392-397
[5]   Divergent exploration in design with a dynamic multiobjective optimization formulation [J].
Curtis, S. K. ;
Mattson, C. A. ;
Hancock, B. J. ;
Lewis, P. K. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 47 (05) :645-657
[6]   On the quality of discrete representations in multiple objective programming [J].
Faulkenberg, Stacey L. ;
Wiecek, Margaret M. .
OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 11 (03) :423-440
[7]   Efficiency for multiobjective multidisciplinary optimization problems with quasiseparable subproblems [J].
Gardenghi, Melissa ;
Wiecek, Margaret M. .
OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 13 (02) :293-318
[8]  
Heintz C, 2002, EAA EXP
[9]  
Kasprzak E.M., 2000, Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis, V3, P173
[10]   Selection-integrated optimization (SIO) methodology for optimal design of adaptive systems [J].
Khire, Ritesh A. ;
Messac, Achille .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2008, 130 (10) :1014011-10140113