An international multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial of lamotrigine and sustained-release carbamazepine in the treatment of newly diagnosed epilepsy in the elderly

被引:146
|
作者
Saetre, Erik [1 ]
Perucca, Emilio
Isojarvi, Jouko
Gjerstad, Leif
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ullevaal Hosp, Epilepsy Unit, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Pavia, IRCCS C Mondino Fdn, Inst Neurol, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Oulu, Dept Neurol, Oulu, Finland
[4] GlaxoSmithKline, Neurosci MDC, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[5] Univ Oslo, Rikshosp, Radiumhosp Med Ctr & Med Fac, Dept Neurol,Div Clin Neurosci, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
关键词
epilepsy; elderly; carbamazepine; lamotrigine; monotherapy; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01128.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To assess the comparative effectiveness, efficacy, and tolerability of lamotrigine (LTG) and sustained-release carbamazepine (CBZ) in the treatment of newly diagnosed epilepsy in the elderly. Methods: Patients aged 65 years or older, who had experienced at least two unprovoked partial and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures, were randomized to receive LTG (n = 93) or CBZ (n = 92) according to a multicenter double-blind, parallel-group design. Trial duration was 40 weeks and included a 4-week dose escalation followed by a maintenance phase during which dosages could be adjusted according to response. Initial, maintenance and maximum dosages were 25 mg, 100 mg, and 500 mg per day for LTG, and 100 mg, 400 mg, and 2,000 mg per day for CBZ, respectively. The primary end point was retention in the trial. Results: In the LTG group, 68 patients (73%) completed the 40-week study period compared with 61 (67%) in the CBZ group, a nonsignificant difference. Time to withdrawal from any cause did not differ between groups (p = 0.34). The number of subjects who completed the 40-week period and were seizure free in the last 20 weeks was 48 (52%) in the LTG group and 52 (57%) in the CBZ group. Adverse events leading to withdrawal occurred in 13 (14%) subjects in the LTG group and 23 (25%) subjects in the CBZ group. Conclusion: LTG and CBZ showed comparable effectiveness, with a trend for higher seizure-free rates for CBZ and better tolerability for LTG. Differences in outcome compared with previous trials may be related to different dosing rates and use of a sustained-release formulation for CBZ.
引用
收藏
页码:1292 / 1302
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicentre, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
    Brodie, MJ
    Overstall, PW
    Giorgi, L
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1999, 37 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [2] A double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy with health-related quality of life as an outcome measure
    Gillham, R
    Kane, K
    Bryant-Comstock, L
    Brodie, MJ
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2000, 9 (06): : 375 - 379
  • [3] Cardiac function and antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly: A comparison between lamotrigine and sustained-release carbamazepine
    Saetre, Erik
    Abdelnoor, Mikael
    Amlie, Jan Peder
    Tossebro, Morten
    Perucca, Emilio
    Tauboll, Erik
    Anfinsen, Ole Gunnar
    Isojarvi, Jouko
    Gjerstad, Leif
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 (08) : 1841 - 1849
  • [4] Antiepileptic drugs and quality of life in the elderly: Results from a randomized double-blind trial of carbamazepine and lamotrigine in patients with onset of epilepsy in old age
    Saetre, Erik
    Abdelnoor, Michael
    Perucca, Emilio
    Tauboll, Erik
    Isojarvi, Jouko
    Gjerstad, Leif
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2010, 17 (03) : 395 - 401
  • [5] Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: A double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy
    Brodie, MJ
    Chadwick, TW
    Anhut, H
    Otte, A
    Messmer, SL
    Maton, S
    Sauermann, W
    Murray, G
    Garofalo, EA
    EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (09) : 993 - 1000
  • [6] Lamotrigine monotherapy in newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy: A double-blind comparison with phenytoin
    Steiner, TJ
    Dellaportas, CI
    Findley, LJ
    Gross, M
    Gibberd, FB
    Perkin, GD
    Park, DM
    Abbott, R
    EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 (05) : 601 - 607
  • [7] Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy
    Privitera, MD
    Brodie, MJ
    Mattson, RH
    Chadwick, DW
    Neto, W
    Wang, S
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 107 (03): : 165 - 175
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate versus controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy: A phase III double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study
    Trinka, Eugen
    Ben-Menachem, Elinor
    Kowacs, Pedro A.
    Elger, Christian
    Keller, Birgit
    Loeffler, Kurt
    Rocha, Jose Francisco
    Soares-da-Silva, Patricio
    EPILEPSIA, 2018, 59 (02) : 479 - 491
  • [9] Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind trial
    Terada, Kiyohito
    Kubota, Yuichi
    Dimova, Svetlana
    Elmoufti, Sami
    Floricel, Florin
    Chellun, Daya
    O'Brien, Terence J.
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2023, 112 : 62 - 67
  • [10] Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Baulac, Michel
    Brodie, Martin J.
    Patten, Anna
    Segieth, Joanna
    Giorgi, Luigi
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2012, 11 (07) : 579 - 588