FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy

被引:47
作者
Veit-Haibach, P.
Antoch, G.
Beyer, T.
Stergar, H.
Schleucher, R.
Hauth, E. A. M.
Bockisch, A.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Neuroradiol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Nucl Med, Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Oncol, Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/17395663
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We aimed to compare the value of combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, PET+CT (viewed side by side), CT alone and PET alone concerning the rTNM stage and influence on therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. 44 patients with suspicion of recurrent breast cancer underwent whole-body [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT. Images of combined PET/CT, PET+CT, PET alone and CT alone were evaluated by four blinded reader teams. Diagnostic accuracies and influence on therapy were compared. Histology and a mean clinical follow up of 456 days served as the standard of reference. Differences between the staging procedures were tested for statistical significance by McNemar's test. Overall TNM tumour stage was correctly determined in 40/44 patients with PET/CT, in 38/44 with PET+CT, in 36/44 with PET alone and in 36/44 patients with CT alone. No statistically significant difference was detected between all tested imaging modalities. PET/CT changed the therapy in two patients compared with PET+CT, in four patients compared with PET alone and in five patients compared with CT alone. Combined PET/CT appeared to be more accurate in assessing the rTNM and showed a moderate impact on therapy over PET and CT. Minor improvements were noted when compared with PET+CT. Experienced readers might therefore be able to provide accurate staging results for further therapy from separately acquired studies. (C) 2007 The British Institute of Radiology.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 515
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET:: Differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions [J].
Cook, GJ ;
Houston, S ;
Rubens, R ;
Maisey, MN ;
Fogelman, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (10) :3375-3379
[12]  
Cook GJR, 2001, Q J NUCL MED, V45, P47
[13]   Positron emission tomographic assessment of "metabolic flare" to predict response of metastatic breast cancer to antiestrogen therapy [J].
Dehdashti, F ;
Flanagan, FL ;
Mortimer, JE ;
Katzenellenbogen, JA ;
Welch, MJ ;
Siegel, BA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (01) :51-56
[14]  
DELBEKE D, ARCH SURG, V133, P510
[15]   The follow-up of breast cancer [J].
Emens, LA ;
Davidson, NE .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) :338-348
[16]  
Engel H, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P441
[17]  
*ESMO, 2005, CLIN REC DIAG TREATM
[18]   Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer [J].
Eubank, WB ;
Mankoff, D ;
Bhattacharya, M ;
Gralow, J ;
Linden, H ;
Ellis, G ;
Lindsley, S ;
Austin-Seymour, M ;
Livingston, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) :479-486
[19]   Detection of locoregional and distant recurrences in breast cancer patients by using FDG PET [J].
Eubank, WB ;
Mankoff, DA ;
Vesselle, HJ ;
Eary, JF ;
Schubert, EK ;
Dunnwald, LK ;
Lindsley, SK ;
Gralow, JR ;
Austin-Seymour, MM ;
Ellis, GK ;
Livingston, RB .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (01) :5-17
[20]   18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect mediastinal or internal mammary metastases in breast cancer [J].
Eubank, WB ;
Mankoff, DA ;
Takasugi, J ;
Vesselle, H ;
Eary, JF ;
Shanley, TJ ;
Gralow, JR ;
Charlop, A ;
Ellis, GK ;
Lindsley, KL ;
Austin-Seymour, MM ;
Funkhouser, CP ;
Livingston, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (15) :3516-3523