Dynamic assessment and influencing factors analysis of water environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

被引:18
作者
Kong, Yang [1 ]
He, Weijun [2 ]
Gao, Xin [3 ]
Yuan, Liang [2 ]
Peng, Qingling [1 ]
Li, Shuqin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhaofang [4 ]
Degefu, Dagmawi Mulugeta [5 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Ctr Int Cooperat Serv, Beijing 100125, Peoples R China
[5] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Ryerson Univ, Dept Architecture Sci, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water environmental carrying capacity; Water sustainability; Spatial -temporal analysis; Influencing factors analysis; Yangtze River Economic Belt; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; RESOURCES; FOOTPRINT; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109214
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Improving water environmental carrying capacity (WECC) is pivotal to support water sustainability and continued economic development. The improvement pathways of WECC based on both subsystem coupling and driving factors have not yet been identified. Therefore, taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case study, this paper firstly constructed a set of scientific comprehensive evaluation index system of WECC based on the coupling system of water resources-water environment-society-economy. Secondly, the improved catastrophe progression method was properly introduced to dynamically evaluate the level of provincial WECC from 2010 to 2018. Finally, the coupling coordination degree (CCD) and obstacle factor diagnosis model were creatively combined to identify the main influencing factors of WECC. The main findings were as follows: (1) The WECC of the YREB was generally low at the provincial and subsystem levels without any obvious upward trend. In comparison, the WECC was higher in Shanghai City, Zhejiang Province and the lower reaches of the YREB. (2) The CCD among the four subsystems was generally low in the YREB. Meanwhile, there was a significant positive correlation between the CCD and WECC in each provincial area, and thus the low CCD was a vital reason for the low WECC in the YREB. (3) Overall, the economic subsystem had the highest restriction on WECC improvement in the YREB, while that of the water resources subsystem had the least. Seen from the mean, the top five obstacle factors of WECC were proportion of ecological environment water consumption, urbanization rate, per capita GDP, proportion of tertiary industry and water consumption per unit of GDP respectively. Furthermore, the rankings of main obstacle factors showed a certain time fluctuation. In general, it could be found out that the CCD of subsystems and main obstacle factors should be focused on simultaneously when improving regional WECC. Additionally, this study has provided a new analytical framework for identifying the pathways of improving WECC, which is also applicable to find the improvement pathways for stability and safety of other complex systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation and coordinated development of an economic, energy, and environmental carrying capacity system from the perspective of scientific and technological progress: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Haofei
    Zhou, Xiuhui
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (12) : 14887 - 14911
  • [22] Systematic Evaluation and Influencing Factors Analysis of Water Environmental Carrying Capacity in Taihu Basin, China
    Hu, Zhibing
    Pang, Yong
    Xu, Ruichen
    Yu, Hui
    Niu, Yuan
    Wu, Changgan
    Liu, Yuan
    WATER, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [23] Analysis of the differences and spatial-temporal dynamic evolution of the environmental sustainability of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Lei, Zhimei
    Cai, Shanshan
    Zhuo, Shaoxin
    Lau, Yui-yip
    Lim, Ming Kim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2024, 19 (05) : 1 - 41
  • [24] Dynamic Evaluation of Water Resources Management Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Sun, Fuhua
    Miao, Caiqin
    Li, Shuqin
    Shen, Juqin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Shengnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [25] Spatiotemporal interactions and influencing factors for carbon emission efficiency of cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Wang, Zhaofeng
    Shao, Haiqin
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 103
  • [26] Quantitative analysis of spatiotemporal disparity of urban water use efficiency and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Ji, Renke
    Wang, Chao
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Nengcheng
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 51
  • [27] Coordinated Evolution and Influencing Factors of Population and Economy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Yazhu
    Zou, Hui
    Duan, Xuejun
    Wang, Lingqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [28] Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of water resource green efficiency in the cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Dalai Ma
    Bitan An
    Jiawei Zhang
    Fengtai Zhang
    Yaping Xiao
    Zuman Guo
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 120963 - 120983
  • [29] Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of water resource green efficiency in the cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Ma, Dalai
    An, Bitan
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Zhang, Fengtai
    Xiao, Yaping
    Guo, Zuman
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (57) : 120963 - 120983
  • [30] An inquiry into water transfer network of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Tan, Feifei
    Bi, Jun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 : 288 - 297