Dynamic assessment and influencing factors analysis of water environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

被引:18
|
作者
Kong, Yang [1 ]
He, Weijun [2 ]
Gao, Xin [3 ]
Yuan, Liang [2 ]
Peng, Qingling [1 ]
Li, Shuqin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhaofang [4 ]
Degefu, Dagmawi Mulugeta [5 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Ctr Int Cooperat Serv, Beijing 100125, Peoples R China
[5] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Ryerson Univ, Dept Architecture Sci, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water environmental carrying capacity; Water sustainability; Spatial -temporal analysis; Influencing factors analysis; Yangtze River Economic Belt; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; RESOURCES; FOOTPRINT; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109214
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Improving water environmental carrying capacity (WECC) is pivotal to support water sustainability and continued economic development. The improvement pathways of WECC based on both subsystem coupling and driving factors have not yet been identified. Therefore, taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case study, this paper firstly constructed a set of scientific comprehensive evaluation index system of WECC based on the coupling system of water resources-water environment-society-economy. Secondly, the improved catastrophe progression method was properly introduced to dynamically evaluate the level of provincial WECC from 2010 to 2018. Finally, the coupling coordination degree (CCD) and obstacle factor diagnosis model were creatively combined to identify the main influencing factors of WECC. The main findings were as follows: (1) The WECC of the YREB was generally low at the provincial and subsystem levels without any obvious upward trend. In comparison, the WECC was higher in Shanghai City, Zhejiang Province and the lower reaches of the YREB. (2) The CCD among the four subsystems was generally low in the YREB. Meanwhile, there was a significant positive correlation between the CCD and WECC in each provincial area, and thus the low CCD was a vital reason for the low WECC in the YREB. (3) Overall, the economic subsystem had the highest restriction on WECC improvement in the YREB, while that of the water resources subsystem had the least. Seen from the mean, the top five obstacle factors of WECC were proportion of ecological environment water consumption, urbanization rate, per capita GDP, proportion of tertiary industry and water consumption per unit of GDP respectively. Furthermore, the rankings of main obstacle factors showed a certain time fluctuation. In general, it could be found out that the CCD of subsystems and main obstacle factors should be focused on simultaneously when improving regional WECC. Additionally, this study has provided a new analytical framework for identifying the pathways of improving WECC, which is also applicable to find the improvement pathways for stability and safety of other complex systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement and analysis of water ecological carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Wang, Peng
    Deng, Hongwei
    Peng, Tao
    Pan, Zheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (42) : 95507 - 95524
  • [2] Measurement and analysis of water ecological carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Peng Wang
    Hongwei Deng
    Tao Peng
    Zheng Pan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 95507 - 95524
  • [3] Examining the spatiotemporal change of forest resource carrying capacity of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Tang, Xu
    Guan, Xingliang
    Lu, Shasha
    Qin, Fan
    Liu, Xu
    Zhang, Dahong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (17) : 21213 - 21230
  • [4] Water Environment Carrying Capacity Assessment of Yangtze River Economic Belt Using Grey Water Footprint Model
    Liu, Peigui
    Yi, Xingyuan
    Feng, Yuan
    Shang, Manting
    Bao, Zhenxin
    WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (08) : 4003 - 4014
  • [5] Evaluation of water environmental carrying capacity of yangtze river economic belt and its driving factors exploration from perspective of spatial-temporal heterogeneity
    He W.
    Meng X.
    Kong Y.
    Zhang X.
    Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [6] Resources and Environmental Pressure, Carrying Capacity, And Governance: A Case Study of Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Bao, Haijun
    Wang, Chengcheng
    Han, Lu
    Wu, Shaohua
    Lou, Liming
    Xu, Baogen
    Liu, Yanfang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN XI'AN, CHINA
    Zhang, Jun
    Geng, Ya-ni
    Zhou, Qi
    Zhao, Ya-qian
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 12 (07): : 1481 - 1486
  • [8] Multiscale disparity and spatial pattern of comprehensive carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Tan, Feifei
    Wang, Feiyue
    Niu, Zhiyuan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 148
  • [9] Assessment of coordinated development between tourism development and resource environment carrying capacity: A case study of Yangtze River economic Belt in China
    Xiao, Yi
    Tang, Xiao
    Wang, Jue
    Huang, Huan
    Liu, Lei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 141
  • [10] Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity in Yangtze River Economic Belt and analysis of its spatial pattern evolution
    Wang, Yuxin
    Yu, Xinghou
    Zhao, Bingjian
    Xiong, Xing
    Li, Yi
    Zhang, Man
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144