Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain

被引:928
作者
Bullmore, ET
Suckling, J
Overmeyer, S
Rabe-Hesketh, S
Taylor, E
Brammer, MJ
机构
[1] Univ London Kings Coll, Inst Psychiat, Dept Biostat & Comp, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Maudsley Hosp, Dept Child Psychiat, London SE5 8AZ, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
brain; imaging/mapping; probability distributions; statistics;
D O I
10.1109/42.750253
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We describe almost entirely automated procedures for estimation of global, voxel, and cluster-level statistics to test the null hypothesis of zero neuroanatomical difference between two groups of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Theoretical distributions under the null hypothesis are available for 1) global tissue class volumes; 2) standardized linear model [analysis of variance (ANOVA and ANCOVA)] coefficients estimated at each voxel; and 3) an area of spatially connected clusters generated by applying an arbitrary threshold to a two-dimensional (2-D) map of normal statistics at voxel level. We describe novel methods for economically ascertaining probability distributions under the null hypothesis, with fewer assumptions, by permutation of the observed data. Nominal Type I error control by permutation testing is generally excellent; whereas theoretical distributions may be over conservative. permutation has the additional advantage that it can be used to test any statistic of interest, such as the sum of suprathreshold voxel statistics in a cluster (or cluster mass), regardless of its theoretical tractability under the null hypothesis. These issues are illustrated by application to MRI data acquired from 18 adolescents with hyperkinetic disorder and 16 control subjects matched for age and gender.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 42
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, ANOVA BASICS APPL ST, DOI DOI 10.1201/B15236
  • [2] Tests for comparing images based on randomization and permutation methods
    Arndt, S
    Cizadlo, T
    Andreasen, NC
    Heckel, D
    Gold, S
    OLeary, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1996, 16 (06) : 1271 - 1279
  • [3] Blair R.C., 1994, Functional Neuroimaging: Technical Foundations, P19
  • [4] Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: A nonparametric approach
    Brammer, MJ
    Bullmore, ET
    Simmons, A
    Williams, SCR
    Grasby, PM
    Howard, RJ
    Woodruff, PWR
    RabeHesketh, S
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (07) : 763 - 770
  • [5] Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis
    Bullmore, E
    Brammer, M
    Williams, SCR
    Rabehesketh, S
    Janot, N
    David, A
    Mellers, J
    Howard, R
    Sham, P
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) : 261 - 277
  • [6] COMPUTERIZED BRAIN-TISSUE CLASSIFICATION OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES - A NEW APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF PARTIAL VOLUME ARTIFACT
    BULLMORE, E
    BRAMMER, M
    ROULEAU, G
    EVERITT, B
    SIMMONS, A
    SHARMA, T
    FRANGOU, S
    MURRAY, R
    DUNN, G
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1995, 2 (02) : 133 - 147
  • [7] COX RW, 1995, P 3 SCI M SOC MAGN R, V2, P834
  • [8] DOBSON AJ, 1983, INTRO STAT MODELING
  • [9] EDGINGTON ES, 1980, RANDOMIZATION TESTS
  • [10] Everitt BS, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P1