Investments in Marriage and Cohabitation: The Role of Legal and Interpersonal Commitment

被引:47
作者
Poortman, Anne-Rigt [1 ]
Mills, Melinda [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
cohabitation; commitment; marriage; UNITED-STATES; RELATIONSHIP QUALITY; FAMILY FORMATION; STABILITY; TIME; NETHERLANDS; HOUSEWORK; COUPLES; UNIONS; TIES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00954.x
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Cohabiters have been shown to invest less in their relationship than married couples. This study investigated the role of legal and interpersonal commitment by examining heterogeneity within marital and cohabiting unions. Going beyond the dichotomy of cohabitation versus marriage, different union types were distinguished by their level of legal and interpersonal commitment, followed by an assessment of their association with joint investments (specialization, having children together, purchasing a home). Using panel data from The Netherlands (N =2,362), the authors found considerable heterogeneity within marital and cohabiting unions. Joint investments increased as interpersonal commitment increased, with cohabiters without marriage plans investing the least and couples who directly married without prior cohabitation investing the most. The relationship between investments and legal union types was less straightforward and often challenged expectations, prompting the authors to elaborate on alternative explanations for their findings.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 376
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[2]   WHEN EVERY RELATIONSHIP IS ABOVE-AVERAGE - PERCEPTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS OF DIVORCE AT THE TIME OF MARRIAGE [J].
BAKER, LA ;
EMERY, RE .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1993, 17 (04) :439-450
[3]  
BLOSSFELD Hans-Peter., 2001, Canadian Studies in Population, V28, P409
[4]  
Boele-Woelki K., 2007, HUWELIJK GEREGISTREE
[5]   The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage [J].
Brines, J ;
Joyner, K .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (03) :333-355
[6]   Moving from cohabitation to marriage: effects on relationship quality [J].
Brown, SL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (01) :1-19
[7]   Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality [J].
Brown, SL ;
Booth, A .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1996, 58 (03) :668-678
[8]  
Cherlin A.J., 2000, TIES THAT BIND, P126
[9]   Cohabitation and housework: The effects of marital intentions [J].
Ciabattari, T .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2004, 66 (01) :118-125
[10]  
DeMaris A., 1992, J MARRIAGE FAM, V54, P399