A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory

被引:54
作者
Boywitt, C. Dennis [1 ]
Rummel, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Dept Psychol, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Prospective memory; Diffusion model; Task interference effect; ADULT AGE-DIFFERENCES; RETRIEVAL; INTENTIONS; COVARIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-011-0128-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Holding an intention often interferes with other ongoing activities, indicating that resource-demanding processes are involved in maintaining the intention and noticing the appropriate event to fulfill it. Little is known, however, about the nature of the processes underlying this task interference effect. The goal of the present research was to decompose the processes contributing to the task interference effect by applying the diffusion model (Ratcliff, Psychological Review 85:59-108, 1978) to an event-based prospective memory task. In the first experiment, we validated the interpretation of the response criterion parameter (a) of the diffusion model as reflecting strategies to cope with the anticipated demands of a prospective memory task in the context of the ongoing task. The second experiment served to investigate which underlying processes contribute to the task interference often found with prospective memory tasks. Diffusion model analyses revealed that the task interference effect was due to (1) less efficient processing in the more demanding than in the less demanding prospective memory task and (2) a more conservative response criterion. We suggest that the anticipated demands and the additional processing demands of the prospective memory task jointly contribute to the task interference effect.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 82
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective memory: a secondary task with promise
    Sauer, J
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2000, 31 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [32] The importance of age-related differences in prospective memory: Evidence from diffusion model analyses
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Aschenbrenner, Andrew J.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (03) : 1114 - 1122
  • [33] Prospective memory: the combined impact of cognitive load and task focality
    Cantarella, G.
    Mastroberardino, S.
    Bisiacchi, P.
    Macaluso, E.
    BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2023, 228 (06) : 1425 - 1441
  • [34] Tool-number interaction during a prospective memory task
    Badets, Arnaud
    Duville, Mathilde
    Osiurak, Francois
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2020, 21 (04) : 501 - 508
  • [35] Self-reported strategy use and prospective memory: The roles of cue focality and task importance
    Harrington, Erin E.
    Reese-Melancon, Celinda
    Turner, Rachael L.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2025, 53 (03) : 711 - 724
  • [36] Age and Individual Differences in Prospective Memory During a "Virtual Week": The Roles of Working Memory, Vigilance, Task Regularity, and Cue Focality
    Rose, Nathan S.
    Rendell, Peter G.
    McDaniel, Mark A.
    Aberle, Ingo
    Kliegel, Matthias
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (03) : 595 - 605
  • [37] The effects of age and focality on delay-execute prospective memory
    Kelly, Andrew J.
    Hertzog, Christopher
    Hayes, Melissa G.
    Smith, Anderson D.
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2013, 20 (01) : 101 - 124
  • [38] Effects of Aging and Prospective Memory on Recognition of Item and Associative Information
    Wang, Wei-chun
    Dew, Ilana T. Z.
    Giovanello, Kelly S.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (02) : 486 - 491
  • [39] Prospective memory in young and older adults: The effects of ongoing-task load
    Smith, Rebekah E.
    Horn, Sebastian S.
    Bayen, Ute J.
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2012, 19 (04) : 495 - 514
  • [40] Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions
    Moritz Walser
    Thomas Goschke
    Marcus Möschl
    Rico Fischer
    Psychological Research, 2017, 81 : 961 - 981