The effect of epidermal growth factor on brush border surface area and function in the distal remnant following resection in the rabbit

被引:19
作者
Hardin, JA
Chung, B
O'Loughlin, EV
Gall, DG
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Hlth Sci Ctr, Gastrointestinal Res Grp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Royal Alexandra Hosp Children, Dept Gastroenterol, Westmead, NSW, Australia
关键词
short gut; resection; surface area; brush border membrane;
D O I
10.1136/gut.44.1.26
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background-Epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been shown to increase intestinal absorptive surface area and transport function in normal animals. Aims-To examine the effect of EGF on absorptive surface area and brush border membrane function in a model of massive small bowel resection. Methods-New Zealand white rabbits were randomised into two groups: a resected group (60% proximal small bowel resection); and an unmanipulated control group. Distal remnant tissue was examined 10 and 21 days postsurgery. In separate experiments oral EGF (40 mu g/kg/day) was administered to resected animals from days 3 to 8 and animals were studied on day 10. Results-Ten days postsurgery brush border surface area and total absorptive surface area were significantly increased in remnant tissue while brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV) glucose uptake was significantly decreased compared with controls. By 21 days brush border surface area returned to control levels though BBMV glucose uptake remained depressed. EGF treatment induced a further increase in brush border surface area in remnant intestine but did not alter BBMV glucose uptake. Conclusions-Surgical resection results in significant elevations in absorptive surface area coupled with a decrease in brush border membrane transport function distal to the site of anastomosis. EGF enhances glucose uptake in remnant intestine via recruitment of additional microvillus membrane into the brush border.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] Lovry O.H., 1951, J BIOL CHEM, V193, P265
  • [22] ANALYSIS OF KINETIC DATA IN TRANSPORT STUDIES - NEW INSIGHTS FROM KINETIC-STUDIES OF NA+-D-GLUCOSE COTRANSPORT IN HUMAN INTESTINAL BRUSH-BORDER MEMBRANE-VESICLES USING A FAST SAMPLING, RAPID FILTRATION APPARATUS
    MALO, C
    BERTELOOT, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY, 1991, 122 (02) : 127 - 141
  • [23] ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SIGMOIDAL CURVES - APPLICATION TO DOSE-RESPONSE DATA
    MEDDINGS, JB
    SCOTT, RB
    FICK, GH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 257 (06): : G982 - G989
  • [24] GLUCOSE-TRANSPORT BY BRUSH-BORDER MEMBRANE-VESICLES AFTER PROXIMAL RESECTION OR ILEO-JEJUNAL TRANSPOSITION IN RAT
    MENGE, H
    MURER, H
    ROBINSON, JWL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1978, 274 (JAN): : 9 - 16
  • [25] CELLULAR ADAPTATION OF AMINO-ACID-TRANSPORT FOLLOWING INTESTINAL RESECTION IN THE RAT
    MENGE, H
    SEPULVEDA, FV
    SMITH, MW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1983, 334 (JAN): : 213 - 223
  • [26] STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL ADAPTATION FOLLOWING JEJUNAL RESECTION IN RABBITS - EFFECT OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR
    OLOUGHLIN, E
    WINTER, M
    SHUN, A
    HARDIN, JA
    GALL, DG
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 107 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [27] EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR UP-REGULATES INTESTINAL ELECTROLYTE AND NUTRIENT TRANSPORT
    OPLETAMADSEN, K
    HARDIN, J
    GALL, DG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 260 (06): : G807 - G814
  • [28] EFFECT OF LUMINAL GROWTH-FACTOR PRESERVATION ON INTESTINAL GROWTH
    PLAYFORD, RJ
    WOODMAN, AC
    CLARK, P
    WATANAPA, P
    VESEY, D
    DEPREZ, PH
    WILLIAMSON, RCN
    CALAM, J
    [J]. LANCET, 1993, 341 (8849) : 843 - 848
  • [29] EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR IS DIGESTED TO SMALLER, LESS ACTIVE FORMS IN ACIDIC GASTRIC-JUICE
    PLAYFORD, RJ
    MARCHBANK, T
    CALNAN, DP
    CALAM, J
    ROYSTON, P
    BATTEN, JJ
    HANSEN, HF
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (01) : 92 - 101
  • [30] ION-TRANSPORT IN THE EXPERIMENTAL SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME OF THE RAT
    SCHULZKE, JD
    FROMM, M
    BENTZEL, CJ
    ZEITZ, M
    MENGE, H
    RIECKEN, EO
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (02) : 497 - 504