Role of green finance, volatility and risk in promoting the investments in Renewable Energy Resources in the post-covid-19

被引:147
作者
Li, Zeyun [1 ]
Kuo, Tsung-Hsien [2 ]
Wei Siao-Yun [3 ]
Luu The Vinh [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Humanities, Geog Sect, George Town, Malaysia
[2] Shih Chien Univ, Coll Management, Dept Finance & Banking, Taipei 104, Taiwan
[3] Chinese Culture Univ, Commercial Coll, Dept Banking & Finance, Taipei 11114, Taiwan
[4] Hung Vuong Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Viet Tri City, Phu Tho Provinc, Vietnam
关键词
Green finance; Renewable energy; Geopolitical risk; Green regulations;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102563
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Among the climate change policies, improving energy efficiency and investment in renewable sources are considered key driving forces that may lead to sustainable outcomes over a longer period. This study aims to provide new insight into the role of green financing, volatility, and geopolitical risk in dealing with the investment in renewable energy sources through micro and macro-level data during 2015-2020 in China. Several benchmarks and other regression estimation approaches were applied to address the study title while considering both direct and indirect association between the variables of interest. The study findings have shown that green financing (in the form of green bonds) and green regulations like environmental taxes play a significant and positive role in promoting investment in renewable energy sources. However, oil price volatility and geopolitical risk adversely impact the investment pattern for the clean energy sources in China when controlling the firm size and corporate governance practices. The study also justifies the moderating role of green regulations while strengthening the relationship between green financing and investment in renewable energy. Based on the study findings, it is recommended that green firms in China should be promoted so that investment in renewable energy sources would be considered as a long-term strategy. Comprehending both theoretical and empirical findings, the study has provided meaningful insights for policymakers and environmentalists to design and implement environmental practices that have sustainable returns.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[2]  
Alao O, 2020, IEEE INT ENER CONF, P1041, DOI 10.1109/ENERGYCon48941.2020.9236599
[3]   Green bonds for financing renewable energy and energy efficiency in South-East Asia: a review of policies [J].
Azhgaliyeva, Dina ;
Kapoor, Anant ;
Liu, Yang .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2020, 10 (02) :113-140
[4]   Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: Empirical evidence from OECD countries [J].
Bashir, Muhammad Farhan ;
Ma, Benjiang ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Shahzad, Umer ;
Vo, Xuan Vinh .
ENERGY, 2021, 226 (226)
[5]   Forty Years of Oil Price Fluctuations: Why the Price of Oil May Still Surprise Us [J].
Baumeister, Christiane ;
Kilian, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (01) :139-160
[6]   Current Trends in Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing [J].
Boye, Joyce I. ;
Arcand, Yves .
FOOD ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2013, 5 (01) :1-17
[7]   Does oil price uncertainty affect renewable energy firms' investment? Evidence from listed firms in China [J].
Cao, Hong ;
Guo, Litian ;
Zhang, Lin .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33
[8]   The role of environmental taxes and public policies in supporting RES investments in EU countries: Barriers and mimicking effects [J].
Carfora, A. ;
Pansini, R., V ;
Scandurra, G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 149
[9]   Does green investment improve energy firm performance? [J].
Chen, Yufeng ;
Ma, Yanbai .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 153
[10]   Institutional investment in online business lending markets [J].
Cummins, Mark ;
Bhaird, Ciaran Mac An ;
Rosati, Pierangleo ;
Lynn, Theo .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 71