Developing Asymmetries without Sonographic Correlate at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

被引:3
作者
Liang, Angela [1 ]
Baraban, Ezra [2 ]
Myers, Kelly S. [1 ]
Mullen, Lisa A. [1 ]
Panigrahi, Babita [1 ]
Oluyemi, Eniola [1 ]
Cimino-Mathews, Ashley [2 ,3 ]
Ambinder, Emily B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pathol, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Oncol, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; BIOPSY; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; 2D;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.210527
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has improved the accuracy of mammography, including resolving many breast asymmetries as overlapping breast tissue. The pathologic outcomes of persistent developing asymmetries visualized at DBT are not well established. Purpose: To characterize the outcomes and the predictors of malignancy for developing asymmetries visualized at DBT without a sonographic correlate. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included all tomosynthesis-guided biopsies of developing asymmetries performed at a single institution from May 2017 through January 2020. A reader study including three breast imaging radiologists determined interrater agreement and inclusion into the study. Electronic medical records were used to extract patient characteristics, imaging characteristics, and pathologic diagnoses. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher exact test, and chi(2) test were used to analyze correlations of patient and imaging characteristics with likelihood of malignancy. Results: The reader study included 95 DBT examinations with moderate interrater reliability (Fleiss kappa = 0.45). There was majority reader agreement in 85 of the 95 DBT examinations (89%) of 83 women (median age, 56 years; interquartile range, 47-69 years), and this finalized the study data set. At pathologic examination, most asymmetries (68 of 85, 80%) were benign, with common diagnoses being fibrocystic change (n = 20), stromal fibrosis (n = 10), and fat necrosis (n = 10). The overall malignancy rate was 20% (17 of 85 asymmetries; 95% CI: 12, 29); 15 of the 17 malignancies (88%) were invasive cancers. Malignancies were more common in women with a personal history of breast cancer (35% vs 10%, P =.02). Conclusion: In 85 developing asymmetries visualized at digital breast tomosynthesis without a sonographic correlate, there was a 20% (95% CI: 12, 29) malignancy rate, which was higher than the rates of malignancy for a developing asymmetry detected at digital mammography. (C) RSNA, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Eby, Peter R.
    Kohr, Jennifer
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [2] Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    Plotkin, Amy
    Euhus, David
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Oluyemi, Eniola
    Di Carlo, Philip
    Philip, Mary
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Cimino-Mathews, Ashley
    Myers, Kelly S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (04) : 845 - 854
  • [3] Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions
    Ariaratnam, Nikki S.
    Little, Sherrill T.
    Whitley, Markus A.
    Ferguson, Kristy
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 47 : 4 - 8
  • [4] Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy
    Bahl, Manisha
    Maunglay, Mary
    D'Alessaneiro, Helen Anne
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (02) : 298 - 304
  • [5] Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography
    Bahl, Manisha
    Lamb, Leslie R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (05) : 1162 - 1167
  • [6] Developing Asymmetry at Mammography: Correlation with US and MR Imaging and Histopathologic Findings
    Chesebro, Allyson L.
    Winkler, Nicole S.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (02) : 385 - 394
  • [7] Developing Asymmetries at Mammography: A Multimodality Approach to Assessment and Management
    Chesebro, Allyson L.
    Winkler, Nicole S.
    Birdwell, Robin L.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2016, 36 (02) : 322 - 334
  • [8] D'Orsi C.J., 2013, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemACR BI-RADS Atlas
  • [9] Early Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening Mammography
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Haas, Brian M.
    Yao, Xiaopan
    Geisel, Jaime L.
    Raghu, Madhavi
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Horvath, Laura J.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [10] Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (02) : 256 - 266