Feeding value of pea (Pisum sativum, L.) -: 1: Chemical composition of different categories of pea

被引:71
|
作者
Bastianelli, D
Grosjean, F
Peyronnet, C
Duparque, M
Régnier, JM
机构
[1] Inst Tech Cereales & Fourrages, F-75116 Paris, France
[2] Union Natl Interprofess Plantes Riches Prot, F-75008 Paris, France
[3] Grp Select Pois, F-80200 Mons, Belgium
[4] Union Cooperat Agr Alimentat Betail, F-02400 Chateau Thierry, France
来源
ANIMAL SCIENCE | 1998年 / 67卷
关键词
chemical composition; peas; Pisum sativum;
D O I
10.1017/S1357729800033051
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lines of peas (no. = 213) grown in the same location were analysed for 1000 seed weight, protein, starch, fat, sugars, ashes and fibre content. Some 54 lines of peas out of the total 213 were grown in large amounts and analysed for the same criteria and also for amino acids, legumin, vicilin, lectins, trypsin inhibitor activity, carbohydrates, fatty acids, tannins, saponins. The lines have been arranged into four categories according to the shape, colour, weight, chemical composition and end uses of the seeds. Feed pens and garden pens are round and have similar composition in terms of protein, starch and fibre contents; they are tannin-free and have variable trypsin inhibitor activity. Coloured pens have also a round shape but differ from the feed and garden pens principally by tannins and also by lower starch, higher protein, higher fibre contents. Wrinkled peas differ from the feed and garden peas by lower starch, higher protein, higher fibre, higher lipid contents and their starch is characterized by a higher amylose/amylopectine ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 619
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regeneration of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) by a cyclic organogenic system
    Emmanouil N. Tzitzikas
    Marjan Bergervoet
    Krit Raemakers
    Jean-Paul Vincken
    Andre van Lammeren
    Richard G. F. Visser
    Plant Cell Reports, 2004, 23 : 453 - 460
  • [32] Application of SNPs to improve yield of Pisum sativum L. (pea)
    Mehmood, Ansar
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    IET NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 11 (04) : 390 - 394
  • [33] Regulation of cotyledonary bud outgrowth in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Kucsera, Attila
    Balla, Jozef
    Prochazka, Stanislav
    MENDELNET 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF 26TH INTERNATIONAL PHD STUDENTS CONFERENCE, 2019, : 443 - 446
  • [34] Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Weeden, NF
    Brauner, S
    Przyborowski, JA
    CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 7 (2B) : 657 - 663
  • [35] Genomics assisted mapping of earliness in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Parteek Kumar
    Saurabh Yadav
    Manisha Rani
    Deepika Narang
    Deepak Singla
    Rajinder Kumar Dhall
    Parveen Chhuneja
    Priti Sharma
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2025, 52 (1)
  • [36] Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    K. Loridon
    K. McPhee
    J. Morin
    P. Dubreuil
    M. L. Pilet-Nayel
    G. Aubert
    C. Rameau
    A. Baranger
    C. Coyne
    I. Lejeune-Hènaut
    J. Burstin
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 111 : 1022 - 1031
  • [37] Sources of high tolerance to salinity in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Leonforte, A.
    Forster, J. W.
    Redden, R. J.
    Nicolas, M. E.
    Salisbury, P. A.
    EUPHYTICA, 2013, 189 (02) : 203 - 216
  • [38] Root growth of green pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes
    Thorup-Kristensen, K
    CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (06) : 1445 - 1451
  • [39] New allele of the COCHLEATA gene in pea Pisum sativum L.
    A. A. Sinjushin
    G. A. Khartina
    S. A. Gostimskii
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2011, 47 : 1422 - 1427
  • [40] Development and Study of SCAR Markers in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    O. V. Koveza
    S. A. Gostimsky
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2005, 41 : 1254 - 1261