Feeding value of pea (Pisum sativum, L.) -: 1: Chemical composition of different categories of pea

被引:71
|
作者
Bastianelli, D
Grosjean, F
Peyronnet, C
Duparque, M
Régnier, JM
机构
[1] Inst Tech Cereales & Fourrages, F-75116 Paris, France
[2] Union Natl Interprofess Plantes Riches Prot, F-75008 Paris, France
[3] Grp Select Pois, F-80200 Mons, Belgium
[4] Union Cooperat Agr Alimentat Betail, F-02400 Chateau Thierry, France
来源
ANIMAL SCIENCE | 1998年 / 67卷
关键词
chemical composition; peas; Pisum sativum;
D O I
10.1017/S1357729800033051
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lines of peas (no. = 213) grown in the same location were analysed for 1000 seed weight, protein, starch, fat, sugars, ashes and fibre content. Some 54 lines of peas out of the total 213 were grown in large amounts and analysed for the same criteria and also for amino acids, legumin, vicilin, lectins, trypsin inhibitor activity, carbohydrates, fatty acids, tannins, saponins. The lines have been arranged into four categories according to the shape, colour, weight, chemical composition and end uses of the seeds. Feed pens and garden pens are round and have similar composition in terms of protein, starch and fibre contents; they are tannin-free and have variable trypsin inhibitor activity. Coloured pens have also a round shape but differ from the feed and garden pens principally by tannins and also by lower starch, higher protein, higher fibre contents. Wrinkled peas differ from the feed and garden peas by lower starch, higher protein, higher fibre, higher lipid contents and their starch is characterized by a higher amylose/amylopectine ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 619
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chemical composition and biological activities of aqueous extracts and their sulfated derivatives of pea peel (Pisum sativum L.)
    Abd El-Galil, Asmaa A.
    El-Dein, Asmaa Negm
    Awad, Hanem M.
    Helmy, Wafaa A.
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35
  • [22] A Comprehensive Review of Pea (Pisum sativum L.): Chemical Composition, Processing, Health Benefits, and Food Applications
    Wu, Ding-Tao
    Li, Wen-Xing
    Wan, Jia-Jia
    Hu, Yi-Chen
    Gan, Ren-You
    Zou, Liang
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (13)
  • [23] The Dynamic of Nitrogen Uptake from Different Sources by Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Wysokinski, Andrzej
    Lozak, Izabela
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [24] Physiological and agrochemical properties of different symbiotic genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Nazaryuk, V. M.
    Sidorova, K. K.
    Shumny, V. K.
    Kalimullina, F. R.
    Klenova, M. I.
    BIOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 33 (06) : 559 - 567
  • [25] Physiological and agrochemical properties of different symbiotic genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    V. M. Nazaryuk
    K. K. Sidorova
    V. K. Shumny
    F. R. Kalimullina
    M. I. Klenova
    Biology Bulletin, 2006, 33 : 559 - 567
  • [26] Trypsin inhibitor activity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)
    Wang, XF
    Warkentin, TD
    Briggs, CJ
    Oomah, BD
    Campbell, CG
    Woods, S
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (07) : 2620 - 2623
  • [27] Efficient intergeneric fusion of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) protoplasts
    Durieu, P
    Ochatt, SJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2000, 51 (348) : 1237 - 1242
  • [28] Interaction of pea (Pisum sativum L.) lectins with rhizobial strains
    Bajaj, M
    Soni, G
    Singh, CK
    MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 156 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [29] Study of dominant symbiotic mutants of pea Pisum sativum L.
    K. K. Sidorova
    V. K. Shumnyi
    M. N. Glyanenko
    E. Yu. Vlasova
    T. M. Mischenko
    I. A. Aleksandrova
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2009, 45
  • [30] Development and study of SCAR markers in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Koveza, OV
    Gostimsky, SA
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2005, 41 (11) : 1254 - 1261