A computational method for selection of optimal concrete recycling strategy

被引:24
作者
Akbarnezhad, Ali [1 ]
Nadoushani, Zahra Sadat Moussavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
AGGREGATE CONCRETE; CONSTRUCTION; EMISSIONS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1680/macr.14.00211
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current state-of-the-art concrete recycling technology provides decision makers with the option to produce coarse recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) with different qualities through variations in the number of crushing stages or the use of beneficiation processes available. Variations in the recycling process may significantly affect the economic and environmental impacts of the concrete recycling strategy. This, together with variations in transportation requirements from one project to another, makes it impossible to draw general conclusions about the sustainability of a concrete recycling strategy. This paper proposes a computational method for identifying the optimal concrete recycling method by considering the trade-off between costs, energy use and carbon dioxide emissions of concrete recycling in a particular project. After estimating the amount of various grades of the recyclable concrete available using the data made available by building information models, a computational algorithm is applied to identify alternative feasible concrete recycling methods to produce different RCA qualities and to estimate the costs, energy use and carbon dioxide emissions associated with each recycling method. The latter will then serve as decision-making criteria for selection of the best feasible concrete recycling method. The proposed computational method is applied to an illustrative example.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 558
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
JSA, 2005, A5023 JSA JIS
[12]  
JSA (Japanese Standards Association), 2005, A5021 JSA JIS
[13]   Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications [J].
Knoeri, Christof ;
Sanye-Mengual, Esther ;
Althaus, Hans-Joerg .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05) :909-918
[14]   Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects [J].
Mao, Chao ;
Shen, Qipng ;
Shen, Liyin ;
Tang, Liyaning .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 66 :165-176
[15]   Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete [J].
Marinkovic, S. ;
Radonjanin, V. ;
Malesev, M. ;
Ignjatovic, I. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (11) :2255-2264
[16]  
Noguchi T, 2011, STRUCT CONCRETE, V12, P36, DOI [10.1002/suco.201100002, 10.1002/SUCO.201100002]
[17]   Study on the influence of attached mortar content on the properties of recycled concrete aggregate [J].
Sanchez de Juan, Marta ;
Alaejos Gutierrez, Pilar .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 23 (02) :872-877
[18]   Durability aspects of HVFA-based recycled aggregate concrete [J].
Saravanakumar, Palaniraj ;
Dhinakaran, Govindasamy .
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (04) :186-195
[19]   Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production [J].
Silva, R. V. ;
de Brito, J. ;
Dhir, R. K. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2014, 65 :201-217
[20]   Efficiency factors of recycled aggregate concrete bottle-shaped struts [J].
Singh, Bhupinder ;
Sahoo, Dipak Kumar ;
Jacob, Nobi Mathew .
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (14) :878-887