Web-Based Application to Eliminate Five Contraindicated Multiple-Choice Question Practices

被引:7
作者
Brunnquell, Andreas [1 ]
Degirmenci, Uemuet [1 ]
Kreil, Sebastian [1 ]
Kornhuber, Johannes [1 ]
Weih, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
medical education; assessment methods; test validity; undergraduate education; postgraduate education; TESTS;
D O I
10.1177/0163278710370459
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) evaluate factual knowledge in medical education and have a high reliability, if performed appropriately. However, many MCQs contain formal errors leading to reduced validity. The authors developed a Web application capable of recognizing and eliminating five frequent contraindicated practices in MCQs: negative stem, unfocused stem, cueing words, longest item = right item flaw, and stem/item similarities. The authors used simple string algorithms and dynamic comparisons with keywords. The system was successfully validated with a sample of approximately 800 continuous medical education (CME) questions, showing that our system automatically detects 60% of all formal didactic errors. Flaws not detected by the software can easily be avoided using quick manuals on item wording or clear instruction to the authors. The authors conclude that it is feasible to improve the quality of MCQs by designing a Web application that is capable of detecting common flaws by simple string operations.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 238
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Apraxias [J].
Binkofski F. ;
Fink G. .
Der Nervenarzt, 2005, 76 (4) :493-512
[2]  
Case S.M., 2002, CONSTRUCTING WRITTEN, V3rd
[3]   A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education [J].
De Champlain, Andre F. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) :109-117
[4]   The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: The consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education [J].
Downing, SM .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2005, 10 (02) :133-143
[5]  
DOWNING SM, 1995, APPL MEAN EDUC, V8, P89
[6]  
GUTMANN A, NERVENARZT IN PRESS, V8
[7]   Cuing effect of "all of the above" on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items [J].
Harasym, PH ;
Leong, EJ ;
Violato, C ;
Brant, R ;
Lorscheider, FL .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1998, 21 (01) :120-133
[8]  
Kuehne-Eversmann L, 2007, MED KLIN, V102, P993, DOI 10.1007/s00063-007-1123-3
[9]  
SMOLLE J, 2009, KLIN MC FRAGEN RASCH
[10]   Use of flawed multiple-choice items by the New England Journal of Medicine for continuing medical education [J].
Stagnaro-Green, Alex S. ;
Downing, Steven M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2006, 28 (06) :566-568