Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy

被引:204
作者
Mens, JMA
Vleeming, A
Snijders, CJ
Koes, BW
Stem, HJ
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Spine & Joint Ctr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, NL-3016 CK Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, NL-3016 CK Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Biomed Phys & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, NL-3016 CK Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Dept Gen Practice Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, NL-3016 CK Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
diagnostic tests; low back pain; sacroiliac joint; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200105150-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a group of women meeting strict criteria for posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy (PPPP). The scores on the Active Straight Leg Raise Test (ASLR test) were compared with the scores of healthy controls. Objectives. To develop a new diagnostic instrument for use in patients with PPPP. The objectives of the present study were to assess the validity and reliability of the ASLR test. Summary of Background Data. Various diagnostic tools are used to diagnose PPPP, but there is still a need for simple tests with high reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Methods. Reliability of the ASLR test was assessed in a group of 50 women with lumbopelvic pain of various etiologies and various degrees of severity. Sensitivity was assessed in 200 patients with PPPP and specificity in 50 healthy women. Sensitivity and specificity of the ASLR test were compared with the posterior pelvic pain provocation test (PPPP test). Results. The test-retest reliability measured with Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two ASLR scores 1 week apart was 0.87. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the scores of the patient and the scores of a blinded assessor was 0.78; the ICC was 0.77. In the patient group, the ASLR score ranged from 0-10; in the control group it ranged from 0-2. The best balance between specificity and sensitivity was found when scores 1-10 are designated as positive and zero as negative. With this cut-off point sensitivity of the test was 0.87 and specificity was 0.94. The sensitivity of the ASLR test is higher than the sensitivity of the PPPP test; an advantage of the ASLR test is the simplicity of measuring the score. Conclusion. The ASLR test is a suitable diagnostic instrument to discriminate between patients who are disabled by PPPP and healthy subjects. The test is easy to perform; reliability, sensitivity, and specificity are high. It seems that the integrity of the function to transfer loads between the lumbosacral spine and legs is tested by the ASLR test.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1171
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Berezin D., 1954, ACTA OBSTET GYNECOL, V23, P1
[2]  
BERG G, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V71, P71
[3]  
Chamberlain WE, 1930, AM J ROENTGENOL RADI, V24, P621
[4]   LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PREGNANCY [J].
FAST, A ;
SHAPIRO, D ;
DUCOMMUN, EJ ;
FRIEDMANN, LW ;
BOUKLAS, T ;
FLOMAN, Y .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (04) :368-371
[5]  
GENELL S, 1949, ACTA OBSTET GYNECOL, V28, P1
[6]   THE QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE - MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES [J].
KOPEC, JA ;
ESDAILE, JM ;
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M ;
ABENHAIM, L ;
WOODDAUPHINEE, S ;
LAMPING, DL ;
WILLIAMS, JI .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (03) :341-352
[7]   Discriminatory power of tests applied in back pain during pregnancy [J].
Kristiansson, P ;
Svardsudd, K .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (20) :2337-2343
[8]   BACKACHE IN PREGNANCY [J].
MANTLE, MJ ;
GREENWOOD, RM ;
CURREY, HLF .
RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1977, 16 (02) :95-101
[9]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF PHYSICAL SIGNS IN LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
MCCOMBE, PF ;
FAIRBANK, JCT ;
COCKERSOLE, BC ;
PYNSENT, PB .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (09) :908-918
[10]   The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints [J].
Mens, JMA ;
Vleeming, A ;
Snijders, CJ ;
Stam, HJ ;
Ginai, AZ .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 1999, 8 (06) :468-473