Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: Normal or special case?

被引:28
作者
Mueller, Alexander [1 ]
Hocke, Thomas [2 ]
Mir-Salim, Parwis [1 ]
机构
[1] Vivantes Hearing Ctr, ORL Dept Friedrichshain Clin, Berlin, Germany
[2] Cochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co KG Hannover, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Cochlear implant; evoked compound action potential; imaging diagnostic; neural response telemetry; NRT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT; SCALA TYMPANI; SYSTEM; THRESHOLDS; DIMENSIONS; AUTONRT(TM); CONTOUR(TM); EXCITATION; PROFILES; SPREAD;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2014.969410
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the measurability and threshold level of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in order to provide a baseline for the development of diagnostic references to support aftercare procedures. Design: In this retrospective study, cochlear implant patients were grouped according to the electrode array type and preoperative diagnostic findings from radiological imaging. ECAP measurements were performed intraoperatively on 22 electrodes for each patient resulting in two comparisons: (1) normal vs. pathological findings based on imaging with same electrode array, (2) perimodiolar electrode vs. straight electrode array within the normal group. Study sample: The study sample consisted of 218 ears with a Nucleus (R) implant. Results: In the group with normal radiological imaging, the percentage of measurable ECAPs was higher than in the pathological group. The ECAP thresholds on 21 electrodes were significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore the thresholds were significantly lower for basal electrodes mainly for the two different electrode types. Conclusion: The pathological changes in the inner ear, the type of electrode array, and the electrode position affect the ECAP threshold. Further consideration suggests that a receiver operating characteristic curve can be derived from the results.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].
Abbas, PJ ;
Brown, CJ ;
Shallop, JK ;
Firszt, JB ;
Hughes, ML ;
Hong, SH ;
Staller, SJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (01) :45-59
[2]   Correlation between NRT measurement level and behavioral levels in pediatrics cochlear implant patients [J].
Al Muhaimeed, Hamad ;
Al Anazy, Fatma ;
Hamed, Osama ;
Shubair, Eba'a .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 74 (04) :356-360
[3]  
Aschendorff A, 2011, HNO, V59, P448, DOI 10.1007/s00106-011-2319-7
[4]  
Battmer RD, 2004, INT J AUDIOL, V43, pS10
[5]   The Internal Dimensions of the Cochlear Scalae With Special Reference to Cochlear Electrode Insertion Trauma [J].
Biedron, Slavomir ;
Prescher, Andreas ;
Ilgner, Justus ;
Westhofen, Martin .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) :731-737
[6]   AutoNRT™:: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus® Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence [J].
Botros, Andrew ;
van Dijk, Bas ;
Killian, Matthijs .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 40 (01) :15-28
[7]   The next generation of Nucleus® fitting: A multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management [J].
Botros, Andrew ;
Banna, Rami ;
Maruthurkkara, Saji .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 52 (07) :485-494
[8]   Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: I. The Relevance of ECAP Threshold Profiles and Scaled Profiles to Cochlear Implant Fitting [J].
Botros, Andrew ;
Psarros, Colleen .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03) :367-379
[9]   The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults [J].
Brown, CJ ;
Hughes, ML ;
Luk, B ;
Abbas, PJ ;
Wolaver, A ;
Gervais, J .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02) :151-163
[10]   Evaluation of Objective Test Techniques in Cochlear Implant Users With Inner Ear Malformations [J].
Cinar, Betul Cicek ;
Atas, Ahmet ;
Sennaroglu, Gonca ;
Sennaroglu, Levent .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2011, 32 (07) :1065-1074