Perioperative Modifications to the Open TLIF Provide Comparable Short-term Outcomes to the MIS-TLIF

被引:5
作者
Berkman, Richard A. [1 ]
Wright, Amanda H. [1 ]
Khan, Inamullah [1 ]
Sivaganesan, Ahilan [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, 1161 21st Ave South,T4224 Med Ctr North, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
MIS-TLIF; mistubular-TLIF; Open TLIF; opioid use; patient-reported outcomes; clinical outcomes; length of stay; estimated blood loss; radiation time; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001181
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This study is a retrospective review of patients' charts and data from longitudinally collected clinical outcomes and opioid use. Objective: In the current study, we aim to compare short-term outcomes data for 139 Open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) patients to recently published data for tubular and endoscopic MIS-TLIF. Background Context: In response to the downsides associated with Open TLIF, such as large incision, blood loss, delayed ambulation, prolonged hospitalization, and opioid-reliance, spine surgeons developed tubular retractor based "minimally-invasive" TLIF. However, the traditional Open TLIF retains its significance in terms of providing successful fusion and improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: We adapted several techniques with an aim to improve short-term outcomes for our Open TLIF patients that combined extensive perioperative counselling, an emphasis on early mobilization, avoidance of overuse of opioid analgesics, early discharge with home care arrangements, use of a posthospitalization drainage tube with intraoperative surgical modifications using small incisions (4-5 cm), a narrow 20 mm retractor, minimal muscle injury, and use of a cell saver to minimize net blood loss. The demographics and perioperative results were compared with data from recent MIS-TLIF studies using Student t test for continuous and chi(2)/exact test for categorical variables. Results: Among the total 139 patients, 115 underwent a single-level procedure, 90% of whom were discharged on the first postoperative day (length of stay=1.13 +/- 0.47 d) with an average net estimated blood loss of 176.17 +/- 87.88 mL. There were 24 two-level procedures with an average length of stay of 1.57 +/- 0.84 days, average net estimated blood loss was 216.96 +/- 85.70 mL. The patients had statistically significant improvements in PROs at 3 and 12 months. Conclusions: The results of this study identify that patients who underwent modified Open TLIF demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes, as compared with the tubular MIS-TLIF, by virtue of avoidance of blood transfusions, shorter hospital stays, and significantly less opioid usage while experiencing satisfactory PROs.
引用
收藏
页码:E202 / E210
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 2-year Assessment of Narcotic Use, Return to Work, Disability, and Quality of Life [J].
Adogwa, Owoicho ;
Parker, Scott L. ;
Bydon, Ali ;
Cheng, Joseph ;
McGirt, Matthew J. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (08) :479-484
[2]   Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new? [J].
Asher, Anthony M. ;
Oleisky, Emily R. ;
Pennings, Jacquelyn S. ;
Khan, Inamullah ;
Sivaganesan, Ahilan ;
Devin, Cinton J. ;
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Asher, Anthony L. ;
Archer, Kristin R. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (06) :847-856
[3]   Opioid-free spine surgery: a prospective study of 244 consecutive cases by a single surgeon [J].
Berkman, Richard A. ;
Wright, Amanda H. ;
Sivaganesan, Ahilan .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (08) :1176-1183
[4]   Less Opioid Consumption With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): A Comparison to Standard Minimally-Invasive TLIF [J].
Chang, Hsuan-Kan ;
Huang, Meng ;
Wu, Jau-Ching ;
Huang, Wen-Cheng ;
Wang, Michael Y. .
NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 (01) :228-236
[5]   Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference? [J].
Cheng, Jason S. ;
Park, Priscilla ;
Le, Hai ;
Reisner, Lori ;
Chou, Dean ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
[6]  
Epstein Nancy E, 2017, Surg Neurol Int, V8, P61, DOI 10.4103/sni.sni_39_17
[7]   Minimally invasive lumbar fusion [J].
Foley, KT ;
Holly, LT ;
Schwender, JD .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) :S26-S35
[8]   Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF [J].
Ge, David H. ;
Stekas, Nicholas D. ;
Varlotta, Christopher G. ;
Fischer, Charla R. ;
Petrizzo, Anthony ;
Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. ;
Passias, Peter G. ;
Errico, Thomas J. ;
Buckland, Aaron J. .
SPINE, 2019, 44 (09) :E555-E560
[9]   Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry [J].
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Ghogawala, Zoher ;
Foley, Kevin T. ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Asher, Anthony L. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (03) :397-405
[10]   Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review [J].
Goldstein, Christina L. ;
Macwan, Kevin ;
Sundararajan, Kala ;
Rampersaud, Y. Raja .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) :416-427