Antibody response after first and second-dose of ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™®) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™®) among health care workers in India: The final results of cross-sectional coronavirus vaccine-induced antibody titre (COVAT) study

被引:88
作者
Singh, Awadhesh Kumar [1 ]
Phatak, Sanjeev Ratnakar [2 ]
Singh, Ritu [1 ]
Bhattacharjee, Kingshuk
Singh, Nagendra Kumar [3 ]
Gupta, Arvind [4 ]
Sharma, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] GD Hosp & Diabet Inst, Kolkata 700013, W Bengal, India
[2] Vijayratna Diabet Ctr, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] Diabet & Heart Res Ctr, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
[4] Rajasthan Hosp, Dept Diabet Obes & Metab Disorders, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[5] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Community Med, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Vaccines; Immunogenicity; Anti-spike antibody; Comorbidities;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.055
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: We assessed the humoral immune response of both ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield (TM)) and BBV-152 (Covaxin (TM)) vaccines in Indian health care workers (HCW). Methods: A Pan-India, Cross-sectional, Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study was conducted that measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike binding antibody quantitatively, 21 days or more after the first and second dose of two vaccines in both severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) naive and recovered HCW. Primary aim was to analyze antibody response (seropositivity rate, Geometric Mean Titre [GMT] and 95% Confidence Interval [CI]) following each dose of both vaccines and its correlation to age, sex, blood group, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. Here we report the results of anti-spike antibody response after first and two completed doses. Results: Among the 515 HCW (305 Male, 210 Female) who took two doses of both vaccines, 95.0% showed seropositivity to anti-spike antibody. However, both seropositivity rate and GMT (95% CI) of anti-spike antibody was significantly higher in Covishield vs. Covaxin recipients (98.1 vs. 80.0%; 129.3 vs. 48.3 AU/mL; both p < 0.001). This difference persisted in 457 SARS-CoV-2 naive and propensity matched (age, sex and BMI) analysis of 116 participants. Age > 60-years, males, people with any comorbidities, and history of hypertension (HTN) had a significantly less anti-spike antibody GMT compared to age <= 60 years, females, no comorbidities and no HTN respectively, after the completion of two doses of either vaccine. Gender, presence of comorbidities, and vaccine type were independent predictors of antibody seropositivity rate and anti-spike antibody titre levels in multiple logistic and log transformed linear regression analysis. Both vaccine recipients had similar solicited mild to moderate adverse events and none had severe or unsolicited side effects. Conclusions: Both vaccines elicited good immune response after two doses, although seropositivity rates and GMT of anti-spike antibody titre was significantly higher in Covishield compared to Covaxin recipients. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6492 / 6509
页数:18
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Cooke G, REACT 2 ROUND 5 INCR, DOI [10.1101/ 2021.02.26.21252512, DOI 10.1101/2021.02.26.21252512
  • [2] THIS]
  • [3] Ella R, 2021, LANCET INFECT DIS, V21, P637, DOI [10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30942-7, 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00070-0]
  • [4] Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Folegatti, Pedro M.
    Ewer, Katie J.
    Aley, Parvinder K.
    Angus, Brian
    Becker, Stephan
    Belij-Rammerstorfer, Sandra
    Bellamy, Duncan
    Bibi, Sagida
    Bittaye, Mustapha
    Clutterbuck, Elizabeth A.
    Dold, Christina
    Faust, Saul N.
    Finn, Adam
    Flaxman, Amy L.
    Hallis, Bassam
    Heath, Paul
    Jenkin, Daniel
    Lazarus, Rajeka
    Makinson, Rebecca
    Minassian, Angela M.
    Pollock, Katrina M.
    Ramasamy, Maheshi
    Robinson, Hannah
    Snape, Matthew
    Tarrant, Richard
    Voysey, Merryn
    Green, Catherine
    Douglas, Alexander D.
    Hill, Adrian V. S.
    Lambe, Teresa
    Gilbert, Sarah C.
    Pollard, Andrew J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10249) : 467 - 478
  • [5] Goel Rishi R, 2021, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2021.03.03.21252872
  • [6] Humoral Response to the Pfizer BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis
    Grupper, Ayelet
    Sharon, Nechama
    Finn, Talya
    Cohen, Regev
    Israel, Meital
    Agbaria, Amir
    Rechavi, Yoav
    Schwartz, Idit F.
    Schwartz, Doron
    Lellouch, Yonatan
    Shashar, Moshe
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 16 (07): : 1037 - 1042
  • [7] Khoury DS, 2021, WHAT LEVEL NEUTRALIS, DOI [10.1101/2021.03.09.21252641, DOI 10.1101/2021.03.09.21252641]
  • [8] Kumar Singh A., 2021, medRxiv, DOI DOI 10.1101/2021.04.07.21255078
  • [9] VIEWPOINT: COVID-19 Understanding COVID-19 vaccine efficacy
    Lipsitch, Marc
    Dean, Natalie E.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6518) : 763 - 765
  • [10] Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19
    Long, Quan-Xin
    Liu, Bai-Zhong
    Deng, Hai-Jun
    Wu, Gui-Cheng
    Deng, Kun
    Chen, Yao-Kai
    Liao, Pu
    Qiu, Jing-Fu
    Lin, Yong
    Cai, Xue-Fei
    Wang, De-Qiang
    Hu, Yuan
    Ren, Ji-Hua
    Tang, Ni
    Xu, Yin-Yin
    Yu, Li-Hua
    Mo, Zhan
    Gong, Fang
    Zhang, Xiao-Li
    Tian, Wen-Guang
    Hu, Li
    Zhang, Xian-Xiang
    Xiang, Jiang-Lin
    Du, Hong-Xin
    Liu, Hua-Wen
    Lang, Chun-Hui
    Luo, Xiao-He
    Wu, Shao-Bo
    Cui, Xiao-Ping
    Zhou, Zheng
    Zhu, Man-Man
    Wang, Jing
    Xue, Cheng-Jun
    Li, Xiao-Feng
    Wang, Li
    Li, Zhi-Jie
    Wang, Kun
    Niu, Chang-Chun
    Yang, Qing-Jun
    Tang, Xiao-Jun
    Zhang, Yong
    Liu, Xia-Mao
    Li, Jin-Jing
    Zhang, De-Chun
    Zhang, Fan
    Liu, Ping
    Yuan, Jun
    Li, Qin
    Hu, Jie-Li
    Chen, Juan
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (06) : 845 - +