Thulium Laser Prostate Enucleation in Refractory Urinary Retention: Operative and Functional Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Patients

被引:7
|
作者
Carmignani, Luca
Pastore, Antonio Luigi
Picozzi, Stefano Carlo Maria
Finkelberg, Elisabetta
Ratti, Dario
Vizziello, Damiano
Schirinzi, Maria Lucia
Sacca, Antonino
Pisano, Francesca
Maruccia, Serena [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Urol, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 Milan, Italy
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; EAU GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; COMPLICATIONS; VAPOENUCLEATION; VAPORIZATION; HYPERPLASIA; OBSTRUCTION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the functional and operative results of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in patients with indwelling catheters for refractory urinary retention. METHODS Patients with indwelling catheter, undergoing ThuLEP for benign prostate hyperplasia, were prospectively enrolled. Every episode of urinary retention was treated with urinary catheter positioning followed by at least 2 attempts of catheter removal. Patients were investigated with flowmetry and the self-administered International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire at 30 and 90 days following ThuLEP. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-one patients underwent ThuLEP, and 99 of these had indwelling catheters, but only 93 (24%) were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. In 46 patients the bladder catheter was removed on the first postoperative day, in 31 patients on the second postoperative day, in 5 patients on the third postoperative day, in 6 patients on the fourth postoperative day, in 1 patient on the fifth postoperative day, and in 2 patients each on the sixth and seventh postoperative days. The average hospital stay was 2.3 (+/- 1.7) days. No patients undergoing ThuLEP, at the 90-day follow-up, required further catheterization. Flowmetry showed significant improvement in all parameters, and the mean International Prostate Symptom Score dropped from 21.33 preoperatively to 3.2 (P = .004) at 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION This prospective study shows that ThuLEP is a safe and effective approach in refractory urinary retention patients. In our case series, no patients required postoperative intermittent catheterization. All functional outcomes investigated reported a statistical significant improvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 157
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate with Thulium: Yag laser (ES-ThuLEP) versus Thulium Fiber laser (ES-ThuFLEP): outcomes on sexual function
    Perri, Davide
    Besana, Umberto
    Mazzoleni, Federica
    Pacchetti, Andrea
    Calcagnile, Tommaso
    Romero-Otero, Javier
    Roche, Jean-Baptiste
    Govorov, Alexander
    Pushkar, Dmitry
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 43 (01)
  • [32] In the Era of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Is Preoperative Urodynamics Required for Men in Urinary Retention?
    Goh, Keow Mei
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    Lee, Matthew S.
    CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS, 2024, 19 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [33] Effect of Detrusor Overactivity on Functional Outcomes After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients With Benign Prostatic Obstruction
    Jeong, Jeongyun
    Lee, Hyo Serk
    Cho, Won Jin
    Jung, Wonho
    You, Hyun Wook
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (01) : 133 - 138
  • [34] Comparison Between Two Different En Bloc Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Does Technique Influence Complications and Outcomes?
    Castellani, Daniele
    Saredi, Giovanni
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Gasparri, Luca
    Pavia, Maria Pia
    Ambrosini, Francesca
    Berti, Lorenzo
    Sembenini, Federico
    Dellabella, Marco
    UROLOGY, 2018, 119 : 121 - 126
  • [35] Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Is Safe in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms-A Retrospective Feasibility Study
    Becker, Andreas
    Placke, Anne
    Kluth, Luis
    Schwarz, Rudolf
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Chun, Felix
    Heuer, Roman
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Seiler, Daniel
    Engel, Oliver
    Fisch, Margit
    Graefen, Markus
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) : 335 - 341
  • [36] Anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using a novel hybrid thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser generator: surgical technique and clinical outcomes
    Ventimiglia, Eugenio
    Orecchia, Luca
    Bevilacqua, Luigi
    Tondelli, Elena
    Oliva, Isabella
    Cindolo, Luca
    Kartalas Goumas, Ioannis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [37] Does Severity of Chronic Urinary Retention as Estimated by Preoperative Residual Urine Estimation Negatively Impact the Outcome of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate?
    Lopategui, Diana M.
    Blachman-Braun, Ruben
    Porto, Joao G.
    Bhatia, Ansh
    Marcovich, Robert
    Shah, Hemendra N.
    UROLOGY, 2025, 195 : 142 - 147
  • [38] Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Holmium Laser Enucleation and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity
    Woo, Myeong Jin
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Lee, Jun Nyung
    Kim, Bum Soo
    Kim, Hyun Tae
    Kim, Tae-Hwan
    Yoo, Eun Sang
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [39] Prostate arterial chemoembolization for treatment of refractory hematuria and urinary retention in patients with localized advanced prostate cancer
    Wang, Mao Qiang
    Zhang, Jin Long
    Duan, Feng
    Yuan, Bing
    Xin, Hainan
    Fu, Jin Xin
    Ye, Hui Yi
    Yu, Hong Kai
    Feng, Dui-Ping
    Cheng, Kai
    Zhang, Xiu Jun
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2023, 26 (01) : 88 - 95
  • [40] Perioperative Safety and Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Yuk, Hyeong Dong
    Oh, Seung-June
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)