Thulium Laser Prostate Enucleation in Refractory Urinary Retention: Operative and Functional Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Patients

被引:7
|
作者
Carmignani, Luca
Pastore, Antonio Luigi
Picozzi, Stefano Carlo Maria
Finkelberg, Elisabetta
Ratti, Dario
Vizziello, Damiano
Schirinzi, Maria Lucia
Sacca, Antonino
Pisano, Francesca
Maruccia, Serena [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Urol, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 Milan, Italy
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; EAU GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; COMPLICATIONS; VAPOENUCLEATION; VAPORIZATION; HYPERPLASIA; OBSTRUCTION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the functional and operative results of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in patients with indwelling catheters for refractory urinary retention. METHODS Patients with indwelling catheter, undergoing ThuLEP for benign prostate hyperplasia, were prospectively enrolled. Every episode of urinary retention was treated with urinary catheter positioning followed by at least 2 attempts of catheter removal. Patients were investigated with flowmetry and the self-administered International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire at 30 and 90 days following ThuLEP. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-one patients underwent ThuLEP, and 99 of these had indwelling catheters, but only 93 (24%) were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. In 46 patients the bladder catheter was removed on the first postoperative day, in 31 patients on the second postoperative day, in 5 patients on the third postoperative day, in 6 patients on the fourth postoperative day, in 1 patient on the fifth postoperative day, and in 2 patients each on the sixth and seventh postoperative days. The average hospital stay was 2.3 (+/- 1.7) days. No patients undergoing ThuLEP, at the 90-day follow-up, required further catheterization. Flowmetry showed significant improvement in all parameters, and the mean International Prostate Symptom Score dropped from 21.33 preoperatively to 3.2 (P = .004) at 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION This prospective study shows that ThuLEP is a safe and effective approach in refractory urinary retention patients. In our case series, no patients required postoperative intermittent catheterization. All functional outcomes investigated reported a statistical significant improvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 157
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THULIUM:YAG LASER ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE (ThuLEP) - OUR EXPERIENCE IN 246 PATIENTS
    Zebic, Nikola
    Terzic, Velimir
    Krajina, Vinko
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2023, 62 : 104 - 109
  • [22] Safety and effectiveness of high-power thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 mL
    Chang, Ching-Hsin
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Huang, Jung-Yao
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] Thulium laser vapo-enucleation treatment for prostates >100 cc following urinary retention
    Patel, Sheena
    Khan, Masood A.
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2022, 89 (03) : 378 - 381
  • [24] Combined top-down approach with low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostate: evaluation of one-year functional outcomes
    Omar, Mohamed
    Hodhod, Amr
    Moustafa, Ahmed
    Abdullah, Mohamed M.
    El Shazly, Mohamed
    Monga, Manoj
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (08) : 3013 - 3017
  • [25] A randomized trial of holmium laser vs thulium laser vs bipolar enucleation of large prostate glands
    Shoma, Ahmed M.
    Ghobrial, Fady K.
    El-Tabey, Nasr
    El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S.
    El-Kappany, Hamdy A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (06) : 686 - 695
  • [26] Initial experience with thulium fiber laser for prostate enucleation: Analysis of the intraoperative and short-term outcomes in a prospective, multicenter cohort
    Otero, J. Romero
    Quintas, J. Justo
    Rojo, E. Garcia
    Sutil, R. Sopena
    Vallejo, E. Pena
    Mateos, F. Lista
    Bozzini, G.
    Calzada, D. Saenz
    Antolin, A. Rodriguez
    Gomez, B. Garcia
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2024, 48 (05): : 371 - 376
  • [27] Feasibility of en bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in a large case series. Are results enhanced by experience?
    Saredi, Giovanni
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Ambrosini, Francesca
    Barbieri, Simone
    Berti, Lorenzo
    Pacchetti, Andrea
    Iovino, Domenico
    Ietto, Giuseppe
    Libassi, Letizia
    Carcano, Giulio
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [28] Comparison of 120 W 2-μm laser resection of the prostate outcomes in patients with or without preoperative urinary retention
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Wang, Yongchang
    Gao, Jie
    Shan, Yuxi
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2016, 11 (04) : 223 - 228
  • [29] A Multiinstitutional Study of the Effects of Medical Therapy for Lower Urinary Symptoms on the Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
    Warner, Jonathan N.
    Nunez, Rafael N.
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Viprakasit, Davis P.
    Miller, Nicole L.
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (06) : 1385 - 1390
  • [30] Long-term functional outcomes and surgical retreatment after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: A 10-year follow-up study
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Napolitano, Luigi
    Ditonno, Francesco
    Fusco, Giovanni Maria
    Quattrone, Carmelo
    De Sio, Marco
    Romis, Luca
    Riccardo, Filippo
    Nugnes, Maria Rosaria
    Di Lauro, Giovanni
    Trama, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (03): : 309 - 318