Thulium Laser Prostate Enucleation in Refractory Urinary Retention: Operative and Functional Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Patients

被引:7
|
作者
Carmignani, Luca
Pastore, Antonio Luigi
Picozzi, Stefano Carlo Maria
Finkelberg, Elisabetta
Ratti, Dario
Vizziello, Damiano
Schirinzi, Maria Lucia
Sacca, Antonino
Pisano, Francesca
Maruccia, Serena [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Urol, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 Milan, Italy
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; EAU GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; COMPLICATIONS; VAPOENUCLEATION; VAPORIZATION; HYPERPLASIA; OBSTRUCTION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the functional and operative results of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in patients with indwelling catheters for refractory urinary retention. METHODS Patients with indwelling catheter, undergoing ThuLEP for benign prostate hyperplasia, were prospectively enrolled. Every episode of urinary retention was treated with urinary catheter positioning followed by at least 2 attempts of catheter removal. Patients were investigated with flowmetry and the self-administered International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire at 30 and 90 days following ThuLEP. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-one patients underwent ThuLEP, and 99 of these had indwelling catheters, but only 93 (24%) were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. In 46 patients the bladder catheter was removed on the first postoperative day, in 31 patients on the second postoperative day, in 5 patients on the third postoperative day, in 6 patients on the fourth postoperative day, in 1 patient on the fifth postoperative day, and in 2 patients each on the sixth and seventh postoperative days. The average hospital stay was 2.3 (+/- 1.7) days. No patients undergoing ThuLEP, at the 90-day follow-up, required further catheterization. Flowmetry showed significant improvement in all parameters, and the mean International Prostate Symptom Score dropped from 21.33 preoperatively to 3.2 (P = .004) at 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION This prospective study shows that ThuLEP is a safe and effective approach in refractory urinary retention patients. In our case series, no patients required postoperative intermittent catheterization. All functional outcomes investigated reported a statistical significant improvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 157
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Holmium Laser Prostate Enucleation Outcomes in Patients with or without Preoperative Urinary Retention
    Johnsen, Niels V.
    Kammann, Trisha J.
    Marien, Tracy
    Pickens, Ryan B.
    Miller, Nicole L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04) : 1021 - 1026
  • [2] Ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohort
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Berti, Lorenzo
    Maltagliati, Matteo
    Besana, Umberto
    Calori, Alberto
    Mueller, Alexander
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Micali, Salvatore
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Ledezma, Rodrigo
    Broggini, Paolo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Buizza, Carlo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 2029 - 2035
  • [3] Two-micrometer thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique for patients with acute urinary retention
    Zhuo, Jian
    Wei, Hai-Bin
    Zhao, Fu-Jun
    Sun, Feng
    Han, Bang-Min
    Sun, Xiao-Wen
    Xia, Shu-jie
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (03) : 1093 - 1098
  • [4] Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume prostates > 80 ml: 18-month follow-up results
    Zhang, Junjie
    Ou, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    He, Wei
    Wang, Ruizhe
    Mo, Miao
    Chen, Lingxiao
    Xu, Ran
    Jiang, Shusuan
    Peng, Xiaoyan
    Qi, Lin
    Wang, Long
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 1555 - 1562
  • [5] Impact of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Erectile, Ejaculatory and Urinary Functions
    Saredi, Giovanni
    Pacchetti, Andrea
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Berti, Lorenzo
    Scroppo, Fabrizio Ildefonso
    Marconi, Alberto Mario
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 97 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [6] Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in a contemporary cohort
    Perri, D.
    Pacchetti, A.
    Morini, E.
    Besana, U.
    Mazzoleni, F.
    Verzotti, E.
    Maltagliati, M.
    Romero-Otero, J.
    Pastore, A. L.
    Broggini, P.
    Rocco, B.
    Gozen, A. S.
    Kallidonis, P.
    Bozzini, G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [7] Are Outcomes of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Different in Men Aged 75 and Over? A Propensity Score Analysis
    Castellani, Daniele
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Gasparri, Luca
    Pucci, Michele
    Di Rosa, Mirko
    Carcano, Giulio
    Saredi, Giovanni
    Dellabella, Marco
    UROLOGY, 2019, 132 : 170 - 176
  • [8] Thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy in men with refractory urinary retention
    Bach, Thorsten
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Haecker, Axel
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Gross, Andreas
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (03) : 361 - 364
  • [9] Efficacy, safety, and perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate-a comparison of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention
    Trotsenko, Pawel
    Wetterauer, Christian
    Grimsehl, Philipp
    Moltgen, Tilmann
    Meierhans, Susan
    Manka, Lukas
    Seifert, Helge
    Wyler, Stephen
    Kwiatkowski, Maciej
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (07) : 1397 - 1402
  • [10] Efficacy and outcome of holmium laser enucleation of prostate in patients with urinary retention due to advanced prostate cancer
    Tang, Min
    Wang, Chengming
    Li, Pu
    Zhang, Qian
    Qian, Jian
    Meng, Xiaoxin
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1307 - 1313