Methods for Implementing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials

被引:76
作者
Basch, Ethan [1 ,2 ]
Rogak, Lauren J. [2 ]
Dueck, Amylou C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Canc Outcomes Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Biostat Sect, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcome; Symptom; Adverse event; Cancer; Toxicity; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; DATA-COLLECTION; EQUIVALENCE; VERSION; ACCURACY; VOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.011
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is increasing interest to use patient reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer treatment trials. However, there are currently no standard recommended approaches for integrating patient-reported AE measures into trials. Methods: Approaches are identified from previous trials for selecting AEs for solicited patient reporting, administering patient-reported AE measures, and analyzing and reporting results. Findings: Approaches for integrating patient reported AE measures into cancer trials generally combine current standard methods for clinician reported AEs and established best practices for using PRO measures. Specific AEs can be selected for a PRO questionnaire based on common and expected reactions in a given trial context, derived from literature review and qualitative/mixed-methods evaluations and should be the same set administered across all arms of a trial. A mechanism for collecting unsolicited patient-reported AEs will also ideally be included. Patients will preferably report at baseline and at the end of active treatment as well as on a frequent standardized schedule during active treatment, such as weekly from home, with a recall period corresponding to the frequency of reporting (eg, past 7 days). Less frequent reporting may be considered after an initial intensive monitoring period for trials of prolonged treatments and during long-term follow-up. Electronic PRO data collection is preferred. Backup data collection for missed PRO reports is advisable to boost response rates. Analysis can use a combination of approaches to AE and PRO data. If a high proportion of patients is experiencing baseline symptoms, systematic subtraction of these from on-study AEs should be considered to improve reporting of symptoms related to treatment. More granular longitudinal analyses of individual symptoms can also be useful. Implications: Methods are evolving for integrating patient-reported symptomatic AEs into cancer trials. These methods are expected to further evolve as more data from trials become available. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 830
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NIH PUBLICATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[3]  
Atkinson TM, 2015, J CLIN ONCOL, P33
[4]  
Basch E, 2015, J CLIN ONCOL
[5]  
Basch E, 2015, CLIN TRIALS
[6]   Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
McDonough, Tiffani ;
Barz, Allison ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (11) :903-909
[7]   Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Minasian, Lori M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Hay, Jennifer ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Bruner, Deborah W. ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Chilukuri, Ram ;
Baumgartner, Paul ;
Denicoff, Andrea ;
St Germain, Diane ;
O'Mara, Ann M. ;
Chen, Alice ;
Kelaghan, Joseph ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Sit, Laura ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Barz, Allison ;
Paul, Diane B. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09)
[8]   Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Wenzel, Keith ;
Chauhan, Cynthia ;
Eppard, Wayland ;
Frank, Elizabeth S. ;
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Raymond, Stephen A. ;
Spencer, Merianne ;
Tunis, Sean .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) :4249-4255
[9]   The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting [J].
Basch, Ethan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (10) :865-869
[10]   Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Jia, Xiaoyu ;
Heller, Glenn ;
Barz, Allison ;
Sit, Laura ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Appawu, Mark ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
Atkinson, Thomas ;
Goldfarb, Shari ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (23) :1624-1632