Evaluation of knowledge about gestational diabetes mellitus among postpartum women and its connection with women?s sociodemographic and clinical characteristics: a quantitative cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
de Langarica, Aroa Gomez Gonzalez [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Hediger, Hannele [1 ]
Kaeppeli, Barbara Meier [2 ]
Keller-Senn, Anita [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Nursing, Sch Hlth Profess, Katharina Sulzer Pl 9, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Frauenklin str 10, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp Winterthur, Dept Endocrinol & Diabetol, Brauerstrasse 15, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[4] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Sch Hlth Sci Fribourg, Route Arsenaux 16a, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
[5] Cantonal Hosp Winterthur, Dept Endocrinol & Diabetol, Brauer str15, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Gestational diabetes; knowledge; educational level; cross-sectional study; HEALTH-LITERACY; FOLLOW-UP; PERCEPTIONS; EDUCATION; RISK; GDM; INTERVENTIONS; EXPERIENCES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2022.103367
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: to define the knowledge level among postpartum women affected by gestational diabetes and identify its association with women's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Design and Setting: a cross-sectional comparative study was conducted. Data collection took place in a single university hospital in the German speaking part of Switzerland. Participants: a total of 107 postpartum women diagnosed with gestational diabetes in the current pregnancy completed a gestational diabetes mellitus specific knowledge questionnaire (GDMKQ) in German or English in their postpartum period. Further, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Results: Women were between 24 and 45 years old, 56.1% had an academic degree, 60.7% were migrant women coming mainly from other European countries, 17.8% had a previous history of gestational dia-betes, and 31.8% had a family history of diabetes. As measured with the GDMKQ, women with a higher educational level obtained higher scores and therefore showed a better knowledge level about gesta-tional diabetes compared to women with primary and secondary educational levels ( M 13.3 vs M 11.1 and 12.5; chi 2 (2) = 13.003, p = .002). In addition, women with a previous history of gestational diabetes also reached higher scores compared to women with no history of gestational diabetes ( M 13.6 vs M 12.5, Z = - 2.278, p = .023). Conclusion and implication for practice: Even if the knowledge status among women attending this single Swiss hospital is presently very good, a lower educational level was associated with a lower knowledge level and identified as the main factor to hinder women's comprehension of gestational diabetes. More individually tailored consultations by health care professionals may serve to meet women's needs more adequately and support them better in the understanding of their condition. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of pharmacists' knowledge of women's issues in epilepsy: A cross-sectional study in Palestinian pharmacy practice
    Shawahna, Ramzi
    Atrash, Ahlam
    Jebril, Aman
    Khalaf, Areen
    Shaheen, Eman
    Tahboosh, Hala
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2017, 46 : 1 - 6
  • [42] Perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth: A cross-sectional study
    Bashaikh, Saja Mohammed
    Mahboub, Fouzia Abdulrahman
    Orabi, Abeer
    BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 8 (05) : 422 - 430
  • [43] Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Women after Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional, Single Center Study
    Towpik, Iwona
    Jurga, Szymon
    Gramacka, Katarzyna
    Wojciech, Magdalena
    Franek, Edward
    CLINICAL DIABETOLOGY, 2023, 12 (03): : 164 - 170
  • [44] Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Breast Cancer among Saudi Women: A Cross-sectional Study in Riyadh
    Al-Dayel, Meshal
    Arafa, Mustafa
    Nooh, Randa
    Alamri, Fahad
    Fareed, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (06): : 38 - 48
  • [45] Association of spontaneous abortion and lifestyle with diabetes mellitus in women: a cross-sectional study in UK Biobank
    Liu, Sanwei
    Chen, Yangping
    Zhang, Aimu
    Chen, Xinxiao
    Yuan, Lei
    Song, Binbin
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [46] Clinical and sociodemographic factors that may influence the resilience of women surviving breast cancer: cross-sectional study
    Padilla-Ruiz, Maria
    Ruiz-Roman, Cristobal
    Perez-Ruiz, Elisabet
    Rueda, Antonio
    Redondo, Maximino
    Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (04) : 1279 - 1286
  • [47] Social support and symptoms of antenatal depression among women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study in Northern Vietnam (the VALID II study)
    Nguyen, Ai T.
    Nguyen, Kien Dang
    Minh Le, Hieu
    Nguyen, Thanh D.
    Meyrowitsch, Dan W.
    Bygbjerg, Ib C.
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Nguyen, Hanh T. T.
    Vinter, Christina A.
    Linde, Ditte S.
    Gammeltoft, Tine M.
    Rasch, Vibeke
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [48] Clinical Grading of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infection and its Predictors among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-sectional Study
    Thakuri, Jiwesh Kumar
    Kumar, Saroj
    Chakraborty, Sasthi Narayan
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Basu, Debasis
    Kumari, Pinki
    Parekh, Deval
    Ghosh, Sudip
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (05) : PC1 - PC6
  • [49] Predictors of low birth satisfaction among Iranian postpartum women: A cross-sectional study
    Mortazavi, Forough
    Mehrabadi, Maryam
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (01): : 604 - 613
  • [50] Cognition of Breast Cancer Among Gestational Age Turkish Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Demirkiran, Fatma
    Ozgun, Hedef
    Eskin, Mehmet
    Turk, Gulengun
    Cam, Rahsan
    Ozgun, Ozlem
    Demirkiran, Ahmet Ender
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (01) : 277 - 282