Ethno-territorial features of social inequality in the USA

被引:2
作者
V. Zhitin, D. [1 ]
Prokofev, A. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Petersburg State Univ, 7-9 Univ Skaya Nab, St Petersburg 199034, Russia
来源
VESTNIK OF SAINT PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY EARTH SCIENCES | 2022年 / 67卷 / 02期
关键词
social well-being; ethnic group; spatial characteristics; ethnosocial differences; USA; state; INTERMARRIAGE; SEGREGATION; MEXICAN;
D O I
10.21638/spbu07.2022.207
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The social fragmentation of the US population has pronounced ethno-territorial features. Using the example of ten ethnic groups of Americans of various ancestry (German, Italian, Polish, Russian, Chinese, Asian Indian, Filipino, Mexican, Cuban, Salvadoran), the spatial fea-tures of social inequality are examined. Six indicators of social well-being were considered in three areas: education, employment status and earnings. The indicators under consideration include: 1) proportion of individuals without a high school diploma; 2) proportion of individ-uals with a bachelor's degree or higher; 3) proportion of individuals who are not in the labor force; 4) unemployment rate; 5) median annual earnings; and 6) proportion of individuals with income below poverty level. The states and the District of Columbia were taken as the spatial unit for analyzing the ethno-territorial heterogeneity of social inequality in the United States. The study revealed the socio-spatial heterogeneity of the US territory, determined the hierarchy of ethnic groups in terms of social well-being, and identified states that have the highest deviations from the "normal" distribution of the indicators under consideration. The results obtained make it possible to judge both the influence of ethnic origin and a specific territory on the level of social well-being of the US population. The existing social hierarchy of the considered ethnic groups is highly stable in most states. More often than not, members of a particular ethnic group living in more socially wealthy states will outperform members of the same group living in less socially wealthy states in terms of social well-being. However, this feature is not typical for all states and ethnic groups equally. This allows us to assert that in the United States, inequality between ethnic groups can acquire its own specific characteristics depending on a particular territory.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 359
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
[22]   Inequality of Life Chances and the Measurement of Social Immobility [J].
Silber, Jacques ;
Spadaro, Amedeo .
SOCIAL ETHICS AND NORMATIVE ECONOMICS: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF SERGE-CHRISTOPHE KOLM, 2011, :129-+
[23]   Social well-being inequality in Africa [J].
Rossouw, Stephanie ;
Greyling, Talita .
DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2021, 38 (06) :896-918
[24]   Territorial imagination: social media, visual images, and affect in Iranian Kurdistan [J].
Moradi, Sanan .
CULTURAL GEOGRAPHIES, 2025, 32 (02) :183-204
[25]   Social network effects on educational inequality: The role of similarity bias in social influence [J].
Hovestadt, Till ;
Lorenz, Georg .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2025, 98
[26]   Measuring Territorial Social Responsibility and Sustainability Using the EFQM Excellence Model [J].
Rivera, Dalilis Escobar ;
Terradellas Piferrer, Maria Rosa ;
Benito Mundet, Maria Helena .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) :1-25
[27]   Social Capital Inequality and Subjective Wellbeing of Older Chinese [J].
Appau, Samuelson ;
Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi ;
Smyth, Russell ;
Zhang, Quanda .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2022, 160 (2-3) :541-563
[28]   Who Is in Charge? Social Inequality in Different Fields of Volunteering [J].
Meyer, Michael ;
Rameder, Paul .
VOLUNTAS, 2022, 33 (01) :18-32
[29]   Social Inequality: Urgent Problem of the New American Society [J].
Dobrokhotov, L. N. .
SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2016, (02) :93-+
[30]   SOCIAL INEQUALITY IN SCHOOL INTAKES - A DEVELOPING WORLD PERSPECTIVE [J].
Khan, Muhammad .
EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2012, 2012, :219-228