Private land conservation decision-making: An integrative social science model

被引:26
|
作者
Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. [1 ,8 ]
Jackson-Smith, Douglas B. [2 ]
Wilson, Robyn S. [3 ]
Ashenfarb, Matthew [1 ]
Dayer, Ashley A. [4 ]
Hillis, Vicken [5 ]
Iacona, Gwenllian D. [1 ]
Markowitz, Ezra M. [6 ]
Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. [7 ]
Treakle, Tyler [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, 1616 P St NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Fish & Wildlife Conservat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Boise State Univ, Human Environm Syst, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Sociol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conservation behavior; Best management practices; Integrated conceptual model; Private land decisions; Agriculture; Forest management; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ALGAL BLOOM; LANDOWNERS PARTICIPATION; FOREST LANDOWNERS; PRACTICE ADOPTION; FARMER; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113961
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Owners and managers of private lands make decisions that have implications well beyond the boundaries of their land, influencing species conservation, water quality, wildfire risk, and other environmental outcomes with important societal and ecological consequences. Understanding how these decisions are made is key for informing interventions to support better outcomes. However, explanations of the drivers of decision making are often siloed in social science disciplines that differ in focus, theory, methodology, and terminology, hindering holistic understanding. To address these challenges, we propose a conceptual model of private land conservation decision-making that integrates theoretical perspectives from three dominant disciplines: economics, sociology, and psychology. The model highlights how heterogeneity in behavior across decision-makers is driven by in-teractions between the decision context, attributes of potential conservation behaviors, and attributes of the decision-maker. These differences in both individual attributes and context shape decision-makers' constraints and the potential and perceived consequences of a behavior. The model also captures how perceived conse-quences are evaluated and weighted through a decision-making process that may range from systematic to heuristic, ultimately resulting in selection of a behavior. Outcomes of private land behaviors across the landscape feed back to alter the socio-environmental conditions that shape future decisions. The conceptual model is designed to facilitate better communication, collaboration, and integration across disciplines and points to methodological innovations that can expand understanding of private land decision-making. The model also can be used to illuminate how behavior change interventions (e.g., policies, regulations, technical assistance) could be designed to target different drivers to encourage environmentally and socially beneficial behaviors on private lands.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Advocacy science and fisheries decision-making
    Rice, Jake C.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2011, 68 (10) : 2007 - 2012
  • [12] Science, expertise, and the democratization of the decision-making process
    Carolan, Michael S.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2006, 19 (07) : 661 - 668
  • [13] The Ethical Matrix as a Tool for Decision-Making Process in Conservation
    Biasetti, Pierfrancesco
    de Mori, Barbara
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [14] Master planning frame for road infrastructure projects: decision-making model for private investments
    Badasyan, Norayr
    Wibowo, Andreas
    Bendiek, Ansgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2023, 19 (03) : 231 - 247
  • [15] Upstream solutions to coral reef conservation: The payoffs of smart and cooperative decision-making
    Oleson, Kirsten L. L.
    Falinski, Kim A.
    Lecky, Joey
    Rowe, Clara
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Selkoe, Kimberly A.
    White, Crow
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 191 : 8 - 18
  • [16] Practitioner approaches to trade-off decision-making in marine conservation development
    Fortnam, M.
    Chaigneau, T.
    Evans, L.
    Bastian, L.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2023, 5 (05) : 1636 - 1648
  • [17] Why model evacuee decision-making ?
    Gwynne, S. M. V.
    Hunt, A. L. E.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 110 : 457 - 466
  • [18] Decision-making in social contexts in youth with ADHD
    Ma, Ili
    Lambregts-Rommelse, Nanda N. J.
    Buitelaar, Jan K.
    Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
    Scheres, Anouk P. J.
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 26 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [19] Caught Between Personal and Collective Values: Biodiversity conservation in European decision-making
    Primmer, Eeva
    Termansen, Mette
    Bredin, Yennie
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Berry, Pam
    Jaaskelainen, Tiina
    Bela, Gyorgyi
    Fabok, Veronika
    Geamana, Nicoleta
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Haslett, John R.
    Cosor, Georgia Lavinia
    Andersen, Anne H. K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (06) : 588 - 604
  • [20] Virtual bargaining: a theory of social decision-making
    Misyak, Jennifer B.
    Chater, Nick
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 369 (1655)