Private land conservation decision-making: An integrative social science model

被引:26
|
作者
Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. [1 ,8 ]
Jackson-Smith, Douglas B. [2 ]
Wilson, Robyn S. [3 ]
Ashenfarb, Matthew [1 ]
Dayer, Ashley A. [4 ]
Hillis, Vicken [5 ]
Iacona, Gwenllian D. [1 ]
Markowitz, Ezra M. [6 ]
Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. [7 ]
Treakle, Tyler [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, 1616 P St NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Fish & Wildlife Conservat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Boise State Univ, Human Environm Syst, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Sociol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conservation behavior; Best management practices; Integrated conceptual model; Private land decisions; Agriculture; Forest management; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ALGAL BLOOM; LANDOWNERS PARTICIPATION; FOREST LANDOWNERS; PRACTICE ADOPTION; FARMER; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113961
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Owners and managers of private lands make decisions that have implications well beyond the boundaries of their land, influencing species conservation, water quality, wildfire risk, and other environmental outcomes with important societal and ecological consequences. Understanding how these decisions are made is key for informing interventions to support better outcomes. However, explanations of the drivers of decision making are often siloed in social science disciplines that differ in focus, theory, methodology, and terminology, hindering holistic understanding. To address these challenges, we propose a conceptual model of private land conservation decision-making that integrates theoretical perspectives from three dominant disciplines: economics, sociology, and psychology. The model highlights how heterogeneity in behavior across decision-makers is driven by in-teractions between the decision context, attributes of potential conservation behaviors, and attributes of the decision-maker. These differences in both individual attributes and context shape decision-makers' constraints and the potential and perceived consequences of a behavior. The model also captures how perceived conse-quences are evaluated and weighted through a decision-making process that may range from systematic to heuristic, ultimately resulting in selection of a behavior. Outcomes of private land behaviors across the landscape feed back to alter the socio-environmental conditions that shape future decisions. The conceptual model is designed to facilitate better communication, collaboration, and integration across disciplines and points to methodological innovations that can expand understanding of private land decision-making. The model also can be used to illuminate how behavior change interventions (e.g., policies, regulations, technical assistance) could be designed to target different drivers to encourage environmentally and socially beneficial behaviors on private lands.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing uncertainty in decision-making for conservation science
    Ben-Haim, Yakov
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 37 (06)
  • [2] Quantifying the value of participatory science data for conservation decision-making
    Binley, Allison D.
    Hanson, Jeffrey O.
    Robinson, Orin J.
    Golet, Gregory H.
    Bennett, Joseph R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2025,
  • [3] Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation
    Cooke, Benjamin
    Langford, William T.
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Bekessy, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 55 (04) : 469 - 485
  • [4] Spatially explicit models for decision-making in animal conservation and restoration
    Zurell, Damaris
    Konig, Christian
    Malchow, Anne-Kathleen
    Kapitza, Simon
    Bocedi, Greta
    Travis, Justin
    Fandos, Guillermo
    ECOGRAPHY, 2022, 2022 (04)
  • [5] A social-ecological approach to support equitable land use decision-making
    Brueck, Maria
    Benra, Felipe
    Duguma, Dula Wakassa
    Fischer, Joern
    Jiren, Tolera Senbeto
    Law, Elizabeth A.
    Pacheco-Romero, Manuel
    Schultner, Jannik
    Abson, David J.
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (12) : 1752 - 1767
  • [6] A Goal Programming Model to Guide Decision-Making Processes towards Conservation Consensuses
    de Castro-Pardo, Monica
    Azevedo, Joao C.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 25
  • [7] The Decision-Making Model is Determined by the Decision-Making Cost
    Yong, Tan
    SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2013, 9 : 195 - 198
  • [8] An Integrative Decision-making Model for the Operation of Sustainable Supply Chain in China
    Cao Jian
    Ye Xuhong
    Qi Yu
    Luo Yiner
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 1497 - 1501
  • [9] Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making
    Lubell, M. N.
    Cutts, B. B.
    Roche, L. M.
    Hamilton, M.
    Derner, J. D.
    Kachergis, E.
    Tate, K. W.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (06) : 609 - 620
  • [10] Mapping global patterns of land use decision-making
    Malek, Ziga
    Verburg, Peter H.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2020, 65