MONTE CARLO DETERMINATION OF THE CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS HP(3)/Ka IN A RIGHT CYLINDER PHANTOM WITH 'PENELOPE' CODE. COMPARISON WITH 'MCNP' SIMULATIONS

被引:24
作者
Daures, J. [1 ]
Gouriou, J. [1 ]
Bordy, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] CEA, LIST, Lab Natl Henri Becquerel LNE LNHB, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncq359
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work has been performed within the frame of the European Union ORAMED project (Optimisation of RAdiation protection for MEDical staff). The main goal of the project is to improve standards of protection for medical staff for procedures resulting in potentially high exposures and to develop methodologies for better assessing and for reducing, exposures to medical staff. The Work Package WP2 is involved in the development of practical eye-lens dosimetry in interventional radiology. This study is complementary of the part of the ENEA report concerning the calculations with the MCNP-4C code of the conversion factors related to the operational quantity H-p(3). In this study, a set of energy- and angular-dependent conversion coefficients (H-p(3)/K-a), in the newly proposed square cylindrical phantom made of ICRU tissue, have been calculated with the Monte-Carlo code PENELOPE and MCNP5. The H-p(3) values have been determined in terms of absorbed dose, according to the definition of this quantity, and also with the kerma approximation as formerly reported in ICRU reports. At a low-photon energy (up to 1 MeV), the two results obtained with the two methods are consistent. Nevertheless, large differences are showed at a higher energy. This is mainly due to the lack of electronic equilibrium, especially for small angle incidences. The values of the conversion coefficients obtained with the MCNP-4C code published by ENEA quite agree with the kerma approximation calculations obtained with PENELOPE. We also performed the same calculations with the code MCNP5 with two types of tallies: F6 for kerma approximation and * F8 for estimating the absorbed dose that is, as known, due to secondary electrons. PENELOPE and MCNP5 results agree for the kerma approximation and for the absorbed dose calculation of H-p(3) and prove that, for photon energies larger than 1 MeV, the transport of the secondary electrons has to be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Tech. Rep., ICRU Report 57
[2]  
Daures J., 2009, CEA SACLAY
[3]   Why it is advisable to keep WR=1 and Q=1 for photons and electrons [J].
Dietze, G ;
Alberts, WG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2004, 109 (04) :297-302
[4]  
ICRU, 1993, 51 ICRU
[5]  
ICRU, 1992, ICRU Report 47
[6]  
International Commission on Radiation Protection, 2007, ANN ICRP, V37
[7]  
*LOS AL NAT LAB, MCNP5 RSICC 1 40 MCN
[8]  
Marriotti F., 2009, RT20091BAS ENEA
[9]  
*ORAMED FP7, 211361 ORAMED FP7
[10]  
SALVAT F, 2006, WORKSH P BARC SPAIN