Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation

被引:1
作者
Nicol, David S. [1 ]
Hamilton, Ruth [2 ,3 ]
Shahani, Uma [1 ]
McCulloch, Daphne L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Vis Sci, Glasgow G12 0RQ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Royal Hosp Sick Children, Dept Clin Phys, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Dept Clin Phys, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
VEP; Flicker; Luminance modulation; Evoked potentials; Binocular summation; VISUALLY EVOKED-RESPONSE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; SUMMATION; ACUITY; POTENTIALS; CHILDREN; FACILITATION; INFANTS; VISION; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10633-011-9260-7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Steady-state VEPs to full-field flicker (FFF) using sinusoidally modulated light were compared with those elicited by square-wave modulated light across a wide range of stimulus frequencies with monocular and binocular FFF stimulation. Binocular and monocular VEPs were elicited in 12 adult volunteers to FFF with two modes of temporal modulation: sinusoidal or square-wave (abrupt onset and offset, 50% duty cycle) at ten temporal frequencies ranging from 2.83 to 58.8 Hz. All stimuli had a mean luminance of 100 cd/m(2) with an 80% modulation depth (20-180 cd/m(2)). Response magnitudes at the stimulus frequency (F1) and at the double and triple harmonics (F2 and F3) were compared. For both sinusoidal and square-wave flicker, the FFF-VEP magnitudes at F1 were maximal for 7.52 Hz flicker. F2 was maximal for 5.29 Hz flicker, and F3 magnitudes are largest for flicker stimulation from 3.75 to 7.52 Hz. Square-wave flicker produced significantly larger F1 and F2 magnitudes for slow flicker rates (up to 5.29 Hz for F1; at 2.83 and 3.75 Hz for F2). The F3 magnitudes were larger overall for square-wave flicker. Binocular FFF-VEP magnitudes are larger than those of monocular FFF-VEPs, and the amount of this binocular enhancement is not dependant on the mode of flicker stimulation (mean binocular: monocular ratio 1.41, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6). Binocular enhancement of F1 for 21.3 Hz flicker was increased to a factor of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8-3.5). In the healthy adult visual system, FFF-VEP magnitudes can be characterized by the frequency-response functions of F1, F2 and F3. Low-frequency roll-off in the FFF-VEP magnitudes is greater for sinusoidal flicker than for square-wave flicker for rates a parts per thousand currency sign5.29 Hz; magnitudes for higher-frequency flicker are similar for the two types of flicker. Binocular FFF-VEPs are larger overall than those recorded monocularly, and this binocular summation is enhanced at 21.3 Hz in the mid-frequency range.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ADACHIUSAMI E, 1983, EXP BRAIN RES, V50, P341
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, HUMAN BRAIN ELECTROP
[3]   TEMPORAL FREQUENCY RESPONSIVITY SHOWS MULTIPLE MATURATIONAL PHASES - STATE-DEPENDENT VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIAL LUMINANCE FLICKER FUSION FROM BIRTH TO 9 MONTHS [J].
APKARIAN, P .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 10 (06) :1007-1018
[4]   BINOCULARITY IN THE HUMAN VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL - FACILITATION, SUMMATION AND SUPPRESSION [J].
APKARIAN, PA ;
NAKAYAMA, K ;
TYLER, CW .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 51 (01) :32-48
[5]   Do's and don'ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials [J].
Bach, M ;
Meigen, T .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1999, 99 (01) :69-82
[7]  
Eizenman M, 1999, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V40, P354
[8]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR BINOCULAR DISPARITY DETECTORS IN HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM [J].
FIORENTINI, A ;
MAFFEI, L .
SCIENCE, 1970, 169 (3941) :208-+
[9]   Fourier-analysed steady-state VEPs in pre-school children with and without normal binocularity [J].
Johansson, B ;
Jakobsson, P .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2006, 112 (01) :13-22
[10]   VARIABILITY OF THE STEADY-STATE VISUALLY EVOKED-POTENTIAL - INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIANCE AND INTRAINDIVIDUAL REPRODUCIBILITY OF SPATIAL-FREQUENCY TUNING [J].
JOOST, W ;
BACH, M .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1990, 75 (01) :59-66