Research and legal perspectives on the implications of the family privacy protection act for research and evaluation involving minors

被引:0
作者
Renger, R
Gotkin, V
Crago, M
Shisslak, C
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Arizona Prevent Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Arizona Hlth Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109821409801900203
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper reviews the Family Privacy Protection Act of 1995 (FPPA) and its potential impact on research and evaluation involving miners. First it discusses the issues surrounding the FPPA as debated in the United States House of Representatives. The FPPA requires written, or "active," consent from the parent/guardian for survey research involving miners, rather than "passive" consent, which researchers have presumed when parents fail to return forms "opting" their children out of studies. The paper then presents perspectives from researchers and an attorney. It concludes with a case presentation in which researchers relied upon passive consent, and discusses how that case might have been different had the FPPA been in effect.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 202
页数:12
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]   AN ASSESSMENT OF ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE METHODS FOR OBTAINING PARENTAL CONSENT [J].
ELLICKSON, PL ;
HAWES, JA .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1989, 13 (01) :45-55
[2]   Active parental consent school-based research - An examination of ethical anti methodological issues [J].
Esbensen, FA ;
Deschenes, EP ;
Vogel, RE ;
West, J ;
Arboit, K ;
Harris, L .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1996, 20 (06) :737-753