Public engagement in biosciences and biotechnologies: Reflections on the role of sociology and STS

被引:6
作者
Marks, Nicola J. [1 ]
Russell, A. Wendy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sci & Technol Studies Program, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Publ Awareness Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Double Arrow Consulting, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
care as practice; ethics of care; public engagement in science; science and technology studies; science policy; Science and Technology Engagement Pathways (STEP); STEM-CELLS; SCIENCE; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; COMMUNITY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; REFLEXIVITY; DIALOGUE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1177/1440783314562503
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Approaches to public engagement in biosciences and biotechnologies have been informed by work done by sociologists and science and technology studies (STS) scholars, in particular their critiques of traditional elitist and technocratic approaches to science policy. In this article, we analyse one attempt at institutionalising public engagement in Australia, and focus on points of tension between different actors. We explore the roles of social scientists in policy and in public engagement, and the potential for opening up discussions and decision-making about the biosciences and biotechnologies. We reflect on the difficulties for social scientists in maintaining a critical yet constructive voice and draw attention to care as a possible ethico-political commitment and practice that may create opportunities and spaces for improving public engagement and policy making.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 115
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums [J].
Barnes, Marian .
CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2008, 28 (04) :461-481
[2]  
Bowker G. C., 2000, SORTING THINGS OUT C
[3]   From authority to authenticity: the changing governance of biotechnology [J].
Brown, N ;
Michael, M .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2002, 4 (03) :259-272
[4]   2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For public sociology [J].
Burawoy, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (02) :259-294
[5]  
BURAWOY Michael., 2009, HDB PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY, P449
[6]  
Burchell K., 2009, SCI TECHNOLOGY INNOV, V5, P49, DOI DOI 10.17877/DE290R-970
[7]   The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life - Lessons from the French Association of neuromuscular disease patients [J].
Callon, Michel ;
Rabeharisoa, Vololona .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2008, 33 (02) :230-261
[8]   The role of social scientists in synthetic biology Science & Society Series on Convergence Research [J].
Calvert, Jane ;
Martin, Paul .
EMBO REPORTS, 2009, 10 (03) :201-204
[9]   Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology [J].
Chilvers, Jason .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 35 (03) :283-310
[10]   Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: mapping an emergent epistemic community [J].
Chilvers, Jason .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2008, 40 (12) :2990-3008