A single center, open label study of intradermal administration of an inactivated purified chick embryo cell culture rabies virus vaccine in adults

被引:13
|
作者
Recuenco, Sergio [1 ]
Warnock, Eli [1 ]
Osinubi, Modupe O. V. [1 ]
Rupprecht, Charles E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Rabies Program, Natl Ctr High Consequence Pathogens & Pathol, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] LYSSA LLC, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Rabies; Rabies vaccine; Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies; Intradermal vaccination; Viral inmune responses; ANTIBODY-RESPONSE; IMMUNOGENICITY; REGIMEN; PROPHYLAXIS; PCECV; COST; PVRV;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.083
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In the USA, rabies vaccines (RVs) are licensed for intramuscular (IM) use only, although RVs are licensed for use by the intradermal (ID) route in many other countries. Recent limitations in supplies of RV in the USA reopened discussions on the more efficient use of available biologics, including utilization of more stringent risk assessments, and potential ID RV administration. A clinical trial was designed to compare the immunogenic and adverse effects of a purified chicken embryo cell (PCEC) RV administered ID or IM. Enrollment was designed in four arms, ID Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Pre-EP), IM Pre-EP, ID Booster, and IM Booster vaccination. Enrollment included 130 adult volunteers. The arms with IM administration received vaccine according to the current ACIP recommendations: Pre-EP, three 1 mL (2.5 I.U.) RV doses, each on day 0, 7, and 21; or a routine Booster, one 1 ml dose. The ID groups received the same schedule, but doses administered were in a volume of 0.1 mL (0.25 I.U.). The rate of increase in rabies virus neutralizing antibody titers 14-21 days after vaccination were similar in the ID and correspondent IM groups. The GMT values for ID vaccination were slightly lower than those for IM vaccination, for both naive and booster groups, and these differences were statistically significant by t-test. Fourteen days after completing vaccination, all individuals developed RV neutralizing antibody titers over the minimum arbitrary value obtained with the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Antibodies were over the set threshold until the end of the trial, 160 days after completed vaccination. No serious adverse reactions were reported. Most frequent adverse reactions were erythema, induration and tenderness, localized at the site of injection. Multi use of 1 mL rabies vaccine vials for ID doses of 0.1 was demonstrated to be both safe and inmunogenic. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4315 / 4320
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and immunogenicity of a ChAd155-vectored rabies vaccine compared with inactivated, purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine in healthy adults
    Phadke, Varun K.
    Gromer, Daniel J.
    Rebolledo, Paulina A.
    Graciaa, Daniel S.
    Wiley, Zanthia
    Sherman, Amy C.
    Scherer, Erin M.
    Leary, Maranda
    Girmay, Tigisty
    Mccullough, Michele P.
    Min, Ji-Young
    Capone, Stefania
    Sommella, Andrea
    Vitelli, Alessandra
    Retallick, Jamie
    Seetahal, Janine
    Koller, Mark
    Tsong, Rachel
    Neill-Gubitz, Hannah
    Mulligan, Mark J.
    Rouphael, Nadine G.
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (26)
  • [2] Rabies pre-exposure vaccination of children with purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV)
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    Vakil, Hoshang B.
    Bender, Wolfgang
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (07) : 1454 - 1459
  • [3] A Comparative Study on the Adverse Reactions of Purified Chick Embryo Cell Vaccine (PCECV) and Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (PVRV)
    Ramezankhani, Roghieh
    Shirzadi, Mohammad Reza
    Ramezankhani, Azra
    Mozafary, Jamshid Poor
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2016, 19 (07) : 502 - 507
  • [4] An immunogenicity and efficacy study of purified chick embryo cell culture rabies vaccine manufactured in Japan
    Benjavongkulchai, M
    Kositprapa, C
    Limsuwun, K
    Khawplod, P
    Thipkong, P
    Chomchey, P
    Yountong, C
    Naraporn, N
    Ayuthya, ABN
    Raksakate, S
    Samranwetaya, P
    Oka, T
    Ohkuma, K
    Hamasaki, T
    Wilde, H
    VACCINE, 1997, 15 (17-18) : 1816 - 1819
  • [5] Antibody response of patients after postexposure rabies vaccination with small intradermal doses of purified chick embryo cell vaccine or purified Vero cell rabies vaccine
    Briggs, DJ
    Banzhoff, A
    Nicolay, U
    Sirikwin, S
    Dumavibhat, B
    Tongswas, S
    Wasi, C
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2000, 78 (05) : 693 - 698
  • [6] Immunogenicity of a modified intradermal pre-exposure rabies vaccination schedule using a purified chick embryo cell vaccine: An observational study
    Lau, Colleen L.
    Hohl, Norman
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 11 (06) : 427 - 430
  • [7] A randomized open-labeled study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of purified chick-embryo cell rabies vaccine administered in the Zagreb regimen (2-1-1) compared with the Essen regimen in Chinese adults
    Ma, Jingchen
    Wang, Hongchang
    Li, Jun
    Chang, Likuan
    Xie, Yun
    Liu, Zhonglin
    Zhao, Yuliang
    Claudius, Malerczyk
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (10) : 2805 - 2812
  • [8] Protecting Indian schoolchildren against rabies - Pre-exposure vaccination with purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV) or purified verocell rabies vaccine (PVRV)
    Shanbag, Preeti
    Shah, Nitin
    Kulkarni, Madhuri
    Juvekar, Manisha
    Madhusudana, S. N.
    Vakil, Hoshang B.
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    HUMAN VACCINES, 2008, 4 (05): : 365 - 369
  • [9] Reduced dose pre-exposure primary and booster intradermal rabies vaccination with a purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV) is immunogenic and safe in adults
    Roukens, A. H.
    Vossen, A. C.
    Van Dissel, J. T.
    Visser, L. G.
    VACCINE, 2008, 26 (27-28) : 3438 - 3442
  • [10] Comparison of saftey and immunogenicity of purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine (PCECV) and purified vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV) using the Thai Red Cross intradermal regimen at a dose of 0.1 ML
    Madhusudana, Shampur N.
    Sanjay, Thitamaranahalli V.
    Mahendra, Bangalore J.
    Sudarshan, Mysore K.
    Narayana, Doddabele H. Ashwath
    Giri, Anand
    Muhamuda, Kader
    Ravi, Vasanthapuram
    Vakil, Hoshang B.
    Malerczyk, Cladius
    HUMAN VACCINES, 2006, 2 (05): : 200 - 204