How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research

被引:13
|
作者
Woof, Victoria G. [1 ]
Howell, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
McWilliams, Lorna [1 ]
Evans, D. Gareth [1 ,2 ]
French, David P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Wythenshawe Hosp, Nightingale Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9QZ, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; PROBABILITIES; PREVENTION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women's personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1916 / 1924
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Women's stories of living with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta synthesis of qualitative evidence
    Smit, Anri
    Coetzee, Bronwyne Jo'sean
    Roomaney, Rizwana
    Bradshaw, Melissa
    Swartz, Leslie
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 222 : 231 - 245
  • [32] Risk of death from cardiovascular disease following breast cancer: a systematic review
    Gernaat, S. A. M.
    Ho, P. J.
    Rijnberg, N.
    Emaus, M. J.
    Baak, L. M.
    Hartman, M.
    Grobbee, D. E.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (03) : 537 - 555
  • [33] Does Transdermal Testosterone Increase the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review
    Gera, Ritika
    Tayeh, Salim
    Chehade, Hiba El-Hage
    Mokbel, Kefah
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (12) : 6615 - 6620
  • [34] A systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models
    Louro, Javier
    Posso, Margarita
    Boon, Michele Hilton
    Roman, Marta
    Domingo, Laia
    Castells, Xavier
    Sala, Maria
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 121 (01) : 76 - 85
  • [35] Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Woof, Victoria G.
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Howell, Anthony
    Evans, D. Gareth
    French, David P.
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [36] COMPUTER-ASSISTED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BREAST CANCER - WHO SHOULD DO THE MAMMOGRAPHY IN LITHUANIA?
    Krasko, Jan Aleksander
    Pasukoniene, Vita
    Mlynska, Agata
    Ostapenko, Valerijus
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2013, : 52 - 55
  • [37] Factors influencing medication-taking behaviour with adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: A qualitative systematic review
    Xu, Hui
    Zhang, Xiu-jie
    Wang, Da-qiu
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Ai-ping
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (02) : 445 - 458
  • [38] Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer secondary to high-risk proliferative lesions and family history of the disease
    Cen, Cindy
    Chun, Jennifer
    Schnabel, Freya
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (08) : 1543 - 1548
  • [39] What causes breast cancer? A systematic review of causal attributions among breast cancer survivors and how these compare to expert-endorsed risk factors
    Dumalaon-Canaria, Jo Anne
    Hutchinson, Amanda D.
    Prichard, Ivanka
    Wilson, Carlene
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2014, 25 (07) : 771 - 785
  • [40] Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review
    Rainey, Linda
    van der Waal, Danielle
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    Jervaeus, Anna
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (10) : 1275 - 1283