How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research

被引:15
作者
Woof, Victoria G. [1 ]
Howell, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
McWilliams, Lorna [1 ]
Evans, D. Gareth [1 ,2 ]
French, David P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Wythenshawe Hosp, Nightingale Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9QZ, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; PROBABILITIES; PREVENTION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women's personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1916 / 1924
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Illness risk representations and motivations to engage in protective behavior: The case of skin cancer risk [J].
Cameron, Linda D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2008, 23 (01) :91-112
[12]   Coming to terms with the risk of breast cancer: Perceptions of women with primary relatives with breast cancer [J].
Chalmers, K ;
Thomson, K .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (02) :256-282
[13]   The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress [J].
Cull, A ;
Anderson, EDC ;
Campbell, S ;
MacKay, J ;
Smyth, E ;
Steel, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (3-4) :501-508
[14]  
E Anderson Emily, 2018, Narrat Inq Bioeth, V8, P53, DOI 10.1353/nib.2018.0023
[15]   The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate [J].
Esserman, Laura J. .
NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2017, 3
[16]   The Tripartite Model of Risk Perception (TRIRISK): Distinguishing Deliberative, Affective, and Experiential Components of Perceived Risk [J].
Ferrer, Rebecca A. ;
Klein, William M. P. ;
Persoskie, Alexander ;
Avishai-Yitshak, Aya ;
Sheeran, Paschal .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (05) :653-663
[17]   How do women at increased breast cancer risk perceive and decide between risks of cancer and risk-reducing treatments? A synthesis of qualitative research [J].
Fielden, Hannah G. ;
Brown, Stephen L. ;
Saini, Pooja ;
Beesley, Helen ;
Salmon, Peter .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (09) :1254-1262
[18]   What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420) [J].
French, David P. ;
Astley, Susan ;
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Dobrashian, Richard ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Gorman, Louise S. ;
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Harrison, Fiona ;
Harvie, Michelle ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Jerrison, Andrew ;
Machin, Matthew ;
Maxwel, Anthony J. ;
McWilliams, Lorna ;
Payne, Katherine ;
Qureshi, Nadeem ;
Ruane, Helen ;
Sampson, Sarah ;
Stavrinos, Paula ;
Thorpe, Emma ;
Ulph, Fiona ;
van Staa, Tjeerd ;
Woof, Victoria ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[19]  
French DP, 2019, CAMBRIDGE HDB PSYCHO
[20]   PROJECTING INDIVIDUALIZED PROBABILITIES OF DEVELOPING BREAST-CANCER FOR WHITE FEMALES WHO ARE BEING EXAMINED ANNUALLY [J].
GAIL, MH ;
BRINTON, LA ;
BYAR, DP ;
CORLE, DK ;
GREEN, SB ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
MULVIHILL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (24) :1879-1886