Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of Post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation

被引:144
作者
Artifon, Everson L. A.
Sakai, Paulo
Cunha, Jose E. M.
Halwan, Bhawna
Ishioka, Shinichi
Kumar, Atul
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Northport VA Med Ctr, Northport, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01378.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if using a soft-tipped guidewire to cannulate the common bile duct may ameliorate development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitate cannulation of the CBD. DESIGN AND SETTING: A single-center, blinded, randomized trial of conventional cannulation technique using sphinctertome and contrast injection versus guidewire cannulation technique. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 300 patients to conventional cannulation (group I) or guidewire cannulation (group II) technique. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was incidence of acute pancreatitis and secondary outcome measures were ease of cannulation of common bile duct (assessed by attempts required for common bile duct cannulation & rates of precut sphincterotomy) and overall complication rates. RESULTS: Guidewire cannulation was associated with significantly lower likelihood of post-ERCP pancreatitis (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Twenty-five patients (16.6%) in group I and thirteen patients (8.6%) in group II developed acute pancreatitis, P = 0.037. All instances of pancreatitis were mild. There were more women in group II; 41 in group I and 59 in group II, P = 0.028. Otherwise the two groups were comparable for age, age under 35 yr, indication for ERCP, diagnosis, and number of patients with SOD. The number of patients requiring 0-3, 4-6, and 7-10 attempts for successful cannulation of the common bile duct were 87, 48, and 15 in group I and 117, 24, and 9 in group II, respectively, P = 0.001. A total of 33 patients in group I and 13 patients in group II required precut sphincterotomy, P = 0.007. Rates of accidental pancreatic duct cannulation were 21 in group I and 27 in group II, P = 0.34. Rates of overall complication were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Guidewire technique for bile duct cannulation lowers likelihood of post-ERCP pancreatitis by facilitating cannulation and reducing need for precut sphincterotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:2147 / 2153
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones
    Aizawa, T
    Ueno, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [2] Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial
    Andriulli, A
    Clemente, R
    Solmi, L
    Terruzzi, V
    Suriani, R
    Sigillito, A
    Leandro, G
    Leo, P
    De Maio, G
    Perri, F
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) : 488 - 495
  • [3] ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    ROBINSON, DL
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    RANSON, JHC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [4] Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study
    Cheng, CL
    Sherman, S
    Watkins, JL
    Barnett, J
    Freeman, M
    Geenen, J
    Ryan, M
    Parker, H
    Frakes, JT
    Fogel, EL
    Silverman, WB
    Dua, KS
    Aliperti, G
    Yakshe, P
    Uzer, M
    Jones, W
    Goff, J
    Lazzell-Pannell, L
    Rashdan, A
    Temkit, M
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [5] Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts
    Cotton, PB
    Geenen, JE
    Sherman, S
    Cunningham, JT
    Howell, DA
    Carr-Locke, DL
    Nickl, NJ
    Hawes, RH
    Lehman, GA
    Ferrari, A
    Slivka, A
    Lichtenstein, DR
    Baillie, J
    Jowell, PS
    Lail, LM
    Evangelou, H
    Bosco, JJ
    Hanson, BL
    Hoffman, BJ
    Rahaman, SM
    Male, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (02) : 201 - 204
  • [6] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS
    COTTON, PB
    LEHMAN, G
    VENNES, J
    GEENEN, JE
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MEYERS, WC
    LIGUORY, C
    NICKL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [7] COTTON PB, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P309, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00380.x
  • [8] Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique
    Elton, E
    Howell, DA
    Parsons, WG
    Qaseem, T
    Hanson, BL
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (03) : 240 - 249
  • [9] Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy
    Freeman, ML
    Nelson, DB
    Sherman, S
    Haber, GB
    Herman, ME
    Dorsher, PJ
    Moore, JP
    Fennerty, MB
    Ryan, ME
    Shaw, MJ
    Lande, JD
    Pheley, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) : 909 - 918
  • [10] Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study
    Freeman, ML
    DiSario, JA
    Nelson, DB
    Fennerty, MB
    Lee, JG
    Bjorkman, DJ
    Overby, CS
    Aas, J
    Ryan, ME
    Bochna, GS
    Shaw, MJ
    Snady, HW
    Erickson, RV
    Moore, JP
    Roel, JP
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (04) : 425 - 434