Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of Post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation

被引:143
作者
Artifon, Everson L. A.
Sakai, Paulo
Cunha, Jose E. M.
Halwan, Bhawna
Ishioka, Shinichi
Kumar, Atul
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Northport VA Med Ctr, Northport, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01378.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if using a soft-tipped guidewire to cannulate the common bile duct may ameliorate development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitate cannulation of the CBD. DESIGN AND SETTING: A single-center, blinded, randomized trial of conventional cannulation technique using sphinctertome and contrast injection versus guidewire cannulation technique. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 300 patients to conventional cannulation (group I) or guidewire cannulation (group II) technique. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was incidence of acute pancreatitis and secondary outcome measures were ease of cannulation of common bile duct (assessed by attempts required for common bile duct cannulation & rates of precut sphincterotomy) and overall complication rates. RESULTS: Guidewire cannulation was associated with significantly lower likelihood of post-ERCP pancreatitis (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Twenty-five patients (16.6%) in group I and thirteen patients (8.6%) in group II developed acute pancreatitis, P = 0.037. All instances of pancreatitis were mild. There were more women in group II; 41 in group I and 59 in group II, P = 0.028. Otherwise the two groups were comparable for age, age under 35 yr, indication for ERCP, diagnosis, and number of patients with SOD. The number of patients requiring 0-3, 4-6, and 7-10 attempts for successful cannulation of the common bile duct were 87, 48, and 15 in group I and 117, 24, and 9 in group II, respectively, P = 0.001. A total of 33 patients in group I and 13 patients in group II required precut sphincterotomy, P = 0.007. Rates of accidental pancreatic duct cannulation were 21 in group I and 27 in group II, P = 0.34. Rates of overall complication were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Guidewire technique for bile duct cannulation lowers likelihood of post-ERCP pancreatitis by facilitating cannulation and reducing need for precut sphincterotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:2147 / 2153
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones [J].
Aizawa, T ;
Ueno, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (02) :209-213
[2]   Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial [J].
Andriulli, A ;
Clemente, R ;
Solmi, L ;
Terruzzi, V ;
Suriani, R ;
Sigillito, A ;
Leandro, G ;
Leo, P ;
De Maio, G ;
Perri, F .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) :488-495
[3]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
ROBINSON, DL ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
RANSON, JHC .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :331-336
[4]   Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study [J].
Cheng, CL ;
Sherman, S ;
Watkins, JL ;
Barnett, J ;
Freeman, M ;
Geenen, J ;
Ryan, M ;
Parker, H ;
Frakes, JT ;
Fogel, EL ;
Silverman, WB ;
Dua, KS ;
Aliperti, G ;
Yakshe, P ;
Uzer, M ;
Jones, W ;
Goff, J ;
Lazzell-Pannell, L ;
Rashdan, A ;
Temkit, M ;
Lehman, GA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) :139-147
[5]   Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Geenen, JE ;
Sherman, S ;
Cunningham, JT ;
Howell, DA ;
Carr-Locke, DL ;
Nickl, NJ ;
Hawes, RH ;
Lehman, GA ;
Ferrari, A ;
Slivka, A ;
Lichtenstein, DR ;
Baillie, J ;
Jowell, PS ;
Lail, LM ;
Evangelou, H ;
Bosco, JJ ;
Hanson, BL ;
Hoffman, BJ ;
Rahaman, SM ;
Male, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (02) :201-204
[6]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[7]  
COTTON PB, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P309, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00380.x
[8]   Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique [J].
Elton, E ;
Howell, DA ;
Parsons, WG ;
Qaseem, T ;
Hanson, BL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (03) :240-249
[9]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[10]   Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study [J].
Freeman, ML ;
DiSario, JA ;
Nelson, DB ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Lee, JG ;
Bjorkman, DJ ;
Overby, CS ;
Aas, J ;
Ryan, ME ;
Bochna, GS ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Snady, HW ;
Erickson, RV ;
Moore, JP ;
Roel, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (04) :425-434