Comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer: Our institutional experience

被引:7
|
作者
Shanmugam, Subbiah [1 ]
Thanikachalam, Rajkiran [1 ]
Murugan, Arul [1 ]
机构
[1] Kilpauk Med Coll, Govt Royapettah Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Endometrial cancer; laparoscopy; surgical staging; survival rates; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods.Materials and Methods: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months.Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer
    Kong, Tae Wook
    Lee, Kyung Mi
    Cheong, Ji Yoon
    Kim, Woo Young
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Yoo, Seung-Chul
    Yoon, Jong-Hyuck
    Chang, Ki-Hong
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 106 - 111
  • [2] Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer in India
    Ansar P P
    Ayyappan S
    Mahajan V.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 9 (2) : 133 - 140
  • [3] Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma
    Chu, Ling-Hui
    Chang, Wen-Chun
    Sheu, Bor-Ching
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (02): : 188 - 192
  • [4] Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
    Mouraz, Mariana
    Ferreira, Catia Sofia
    Goncalves, Sonia
    Martins, Nuno Nogueira
    Martins, Francisco Nogueira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2019, 41 (05): : 306 - 311
  • [5] Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience
    Geetha, K. R.
    Kudva, Annappa
    Bhavatej
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 71 (03) : 142 - 146
  • [6] Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis — Institutional experience
    K. R. Geetha
    Annappa Kudva
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2009, 71 : 142 - 146
  • [7] Single port laparoscopic approach versus conventional technique in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer
    Couso, A.
    Zapico, A.
    Arribas, I.
    Arnanz, F.
    Gil, S. Justo
    Valenzuela, P.
    Fuentes, P.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 48 (02): : 68 - 73
  • [8] Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer
    Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel
    Shepherd, Amanda
    Momeni, Mazdak
    Mandeli, John
    Chuang, Linus
    Gretz, Herbert
    Fishman, David
    Rahaman, Jamal
    Randall, Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (02) : 160.e1 - 160.e11
  • [9] Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Johansson, Cherynne Yuin Mun
    Chan, Felix Kwok Hee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2020, 8
  • [10] Two-Port Access Versus Conventional Staging Laparoscopy for Endometrial Cancer
    Paek, Jiheum
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Lee, Maria
    Yim, Ga Won
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Young Tae
    Kim, Sang Wun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (03) : 515 - 520