CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy: Specific conversion factors to estimate effective radiation dose from dose length product: A retrospective cross-sectional study across a multi-hospital integrated healthcare network

被引:2
作者
Cohen, Stuart L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jason J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chan, Nicholas [4 ]
McCandlish, John Austin [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Feizullayeva, Chinara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cronin, Paul P. [6 ]
Barish, Matthew [7 ]
O'Connell, William [7 ]
Sanelli, Pina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Dept Radiol, Imaging Clin Effectiveness & Outcomes Res ICEOR, Manhasset, NY USA
[2] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Ctr Hlth Innovat & Outcomes Res CHIOR, Manhasset, NY USA
[3] Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] North Shore Univ Hosp Northwell Hlth, Dept Radiol, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
K-factor; CTPA; Pregnancy; Radiation dose; Radiology; RADIOTHERAPY; PROTECTION; REDUCTION; EXPOSURE; PROTOCOL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109908
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Effective dose describes radiation-related cancer risk from CT scans and is estimated using a readily available conversion factor (k-factor), which varies by body part and study type. To purpose of this study is to determine the specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients and its predictive factors. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluates CTPA in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network from January 2012 to April 2017. Patient and CTPA-related data were obtained from the electronic health record and a radiation dose index monitoring system. Each patient's effective dose was determined by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation with Cristy phantoms and divided by patient dose-length-product to determine the k-factor. K-factor for pregnant patients was compared to the k-factor for adults of standard physique with a one-sample t-test. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed for patient and CT predictors of k-factor. Results: A total of 534 patients were included. The mean k-factor for all patients was 0.0249 (mSv.mGy(-1).cm(-1)), 78% greater than k-factor of 0.014 (p < 0.001) suggested for the general adult population. Multivariable analysis demonstrated lower k-factors with increasing pitch (p = 0.0002), patient size (p < 0.001), and scan length (p < 0.0001). The 120 kVp (p < 0.001) and 140 kVp (p = 0.0028) analyses showed a larger k-factor than 80 and 100 kVp studies combined. Conclusions: Specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients is greater than the previously used generic chest CT k-factor and should be used to estimate the effective dose for CTPA exams in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 96 AAPM
[2]   VTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Bates, Shannon M. ;
Greer, Ian A. ;
Middeldorp, Saskia ;
Veenstra, David L. ;
Prabulos, Anne-Marie ;
Vandvik, Per Olav .
CHEST, 2012, 141 (02) :E691S-E736S
[3]   Venous Thromboembolism A Public Health Concern [J].
Beckman, Michele G. ;
Hooper, W. Craig ;
Critchley, Sara E. ;
Ortel, Thomas L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) :S495-S501
[4]  
Bongartz G, 1999, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[5]   Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy [J].
Bourjeily, Ghada ;
Paidas, Michael ;
Khalil, Hanan ;
Rosene-Montella, Karen ;
Rodger, Marc .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9713) :500-512
[6]   Estimating Risk of Low Radiation Doses - A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. ;
O'Connor, Michael K. .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 182 (05) :463-474
[7]  
Chang Jeani, 2003, MMWR Surveill Summ, V52, P1
[8]   Does radiotherapy around the time of pregnancy for Hodgkin's disease modify the risk of breast cancer? [J].
Chen, J ;
Lee, RJ ;
Tsodikov, A ;
Smith, L ;
Gaffney, DK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (05) :1474-1479
[9]  
Chi J.M., 2019, CURR PROBL DIAGN RAD
[10]   Estimating Effective Dose for CT Using Dose-Length Product Compared With Using Organ Doses: Consequences of Adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or Dual-Energy Scanning [J].
Christner, Jodie A. ;
Kofler, James M. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) :881-889