Linking knowledge management practices to organizational performance using the balanced scorecard approach

被引:16
作者
Chopra, Meenu [1 ]
Gupta, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Delhi Technol Univ, Delhi Sch Management, Delhi, India
关键词
Balanced scorecard; Performance measures; Knowledge management practices; Information and communication technology; Knowledge sharing culture; Knowledge-based human resource management; Strategy and leadership; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; CAPABILITIES; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; COMPETITIVENESS; LEADERSHIP; FRAMEWORK; SUPPORT; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1108/K-04-2019-0295
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to develop a decomposed model to inspect the effect of knowledge management practices (knowledge sharing culture [KSC], knowledge-based human resource management [KHRM], strategy and leadership [S&L], information and communication technology [ICT] on organizational performance [OP]) by using the four balanced scorecard outcomes (BSC) (learning and growth [L&G], internal process [IP] perspective, customer satisfaction [CS] perspective and financial performance [FP]). Design/methodology/approach - The research methodology included development of a research model based on comprehensive literature review followed by survey of knowledge-intensive organizations. A sample of 277 employees was obtained and structured equation modeling analysis using SPSS AMOS was conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings - The study shows that KSC and KHRM have a highly significant effect on all the four aspects of OP; S&L positively and significantly affects only L&G and IP but does not have any significant effect on the other two, i.e. CS and FP, while ICT practices did not affect any of the measures significantly. Research limitations/implications - The data are limited to 277 middle and senior level managers of Indian firms, which may be a limiting factor for generalizability. Originality/value - The proposed model uncovers the dynamics of individual relationships between KM practices and measures of performance (proposed by BSC) in comparison to existing models which have mainly focused on the overall effect.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 115
页数:28
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance [J].
Abualoush S. ;
Masa'deh R. ;
Bataineh K. ;
Alrowwad A. .
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2018, 13 :279-309
[2]  
Ahn-Sook Hwang, 2003, Journal of Knowledge Management, V7, P92, DOI 10.1108/13673270310485659
[3]  
Akhavan P., 2006, VINE, V36, P52, DOI 10.1108/03055720610667372
[4]  
Al-Busaidi K.A., 2005, J GLOB INF TECH MAN, V8, P6, DOI DOI 10.1080/1097198X.2005.10856400
[5]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[6]  
Allard S, 2002, J COMPUT INFORM SYST, V42, P19
[7]  
American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC), 1999, KNOWL MAN EX SUMM CO
[8]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[9]   Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance [J].
Andreeva, Tatiana ;
Kianto, Aino .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 16 (04) :617-636
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME, DOI DOI 10.1108/13673270610670911