Socioeconomic Drivers of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States

被引:108
作者
Liang, Sai [1 ]
Wang, Hongxia [1 ,2 ]
Qu, Shen [1 ]
Feng, Tiantian [1 ,3 ]
Guan, Dabo [4 ]
Fang, Hong [2 ]
Xu, Ming [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[4] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Tongji Univ, Sustainable Dev & New Type Urbanizat Think Tank, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; INPUT-OUTPUT DATABASE; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURE; SUPPLY CHAIN; CHINA; ENERGY; AGGREGATION; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.6b00872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing studies examined the U.S.'s direct GHG emitters and final consumers driving upstream GHG emissions, but overlooked the U.S.'s primary suppliers enabling downstream GHG emissions and relative contributions of socioeconomic factors to GHG emission changes from the supply side. This study investigates GHG emissions of sectors in the U.S. from production-based (direct emissions), consumption-based (upstream emissions driven by final consumption of products), and income-based (downstream emissions enabled by primary inputs of sectors) viewpoints. We also quantify relative contributions of socioeconomic factors to the US's GHG emission changes during 1995-2009 from both the consumption and supply sides, using structural decomposition analysis (SDA). Results show that income-based method can identify new critical sectors leading to GHG emissions (e.g., Renting of Machinery & Equipment and Other Business Activities and Financial Intermediation sectors) which are unidentifiable by production-based and consumption-based methods. Moreover, the supply side SDA reveals new factors for GHG emission changes: mainly production output structure representing product allocation pattern and primary input structure indicating sectoral shares in primary inputs. In addition to production-side and consumption-side GHG reduction measures, the U.S. should also pay attention to supply side measures such as influencing the behaviors of product allocation and primary inputs.
引用
收藏
页码:7535 / 7545
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions From US Liquefied Natural Gas Exports: Implications for End Uses [J].
Abrahams, Leslie S. ;
Samaras, Constantine ;
Griffin, W. Michael ;
Matthews, H. Scott .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (05) :3237-3245
[2]   A MULTI-REGION INPUT-OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) [J].
Andrew, Robbie M. ;
Peters, Glen P. .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (01) :99-121
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, World Development Indicators
[4]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CARRYING-CAPACITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
ARROW, K ;
BOLIN, B ;
COSTANZA, R ;
DASGUPTA, P ;
FOLKE, C ;
HOLLING, CS ;
JANSSON, BO ;
LEVIN, S ;
MALER, KG ;
PERRINGS, C ;
PIMENTEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5210) :520-521
[5]   Drivers of the Growth in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions [J].
Arto, Inaki ;
Dietzenbacher, Erik .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (10) :5388-5394
[6]  
Augustinovics M., 1970, Contributions to Input-Output Analysis. Vol. 1 of Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques. Geneva, 1968, V1, P249
[7]  
Biasing T. J., 2004, TRENDS COMPENDIUM DA, DOI [10.3334/CDIAC/ffe.001, DOI 10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.001]
[8]   Specification and Aggregation Errors in Environmentally Extended Input-Output Models [J].
Bouwmeester, Maaike C. ;
Oosterhaven, Jan .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (03) :307-335
[9]  
Bradley Z.H., 2005, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V16, P218, DOI DOI 10.1108/09574090510634520
[10]   Carbon dioxide emissions in the US economy - A structural decomposition analysis [J].
Casler, SD ;
Rose, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (3-4) :349-363