Optimization and decision-making framework for multi-staged asteroid deflection campaigns under epistemic uncertainties

被引:13
|
作者
Paek, Sung Wook [1 ]
de Weck, Olivier [1 ]
Hoffman, Jeffrey [1 ]
Binzel, Richard [2 ]
Miller, David [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Near-Earth asteroid; Kinetic impactor; Deflection campaign; Uncertainty; ITOKAWA;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.10.042
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this study, we introduce a framework for planning and assessing multi-spacecraft asteroid deflection campaigns. In the scenario considered, a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) is nudged away from gravitational keyholes via a kinetic impactor (KI) technique, lest its passage should incur an Earth collision in the future. An asteroid orbiter or/and an impactor is/are used in the precursor stage to obtain uncertain information about the target asteroid, whose launch date and trajectory are optimized using Chebyshev's method and a genetic algorithm. The KI mass is optimized through Monte Carlo simulations to improve the robustness of the method and achieve the minimum required probability of success (PoS). Case scenarios targeting Apophis and Bennu substantiate the utility of the framework in optimizing different deflection campaign architectures and making decisions amongst them via newly proposed visualization methods.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 41
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore wind turbine selection: A case study in China
    Yu, Yang
    Wu, Shibo
    Yu, Jianxing
    Xu, Ya
    Song, Lin
    Xu, Weipeng
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 328
  • [22] Sustainability driven multi-criteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment
    Ma, Junfeng
    Harstvedt, James D.
    Jaradat, Raed
    Smith, Brian
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 140
  • [23] A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study
    Gülçin Büyüközkan
    Gizem Tüfekçi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 53507 - 53519
  • [24] Sustainability prioritization framework of biorefinery: A novel multi-criteria decision-making model under uncertainty based on an improved interval goal programming method
    Lin, Ruojue
    Man, Yi
    Lee, Carman K. M.
    Ji, Ping
    Ren, Jingzheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 251
  • [25] A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Tufekci, Gizem
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (38) : 53507 - 53519
  • [26] Optimizing E-Commerce Selection Under Uncertainty: A New Framework for Decision-Making With Extended Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Edward, Jency Leona
    Kaliyaperumal, Palanivel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 2024 (01)
  • [27] OPTIMAL DESIGN OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE SYSTEMS UNDER LARGE-SCALE UNCERTAINTIES IN ENERGY DEMANDS BASED ON DECISION-MAKING THEORY
    Yang, Yun
    Li, Da
    Zhang, Shi-Jie
    Xiao, Yun-Han
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 23 (02): : 873 - 882
  • [28] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to assess the enablers of manufacturing flexibility under fuzzy environment
    Mishra, Ruchi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 38 (04) : 955 - 985
  • [29] AN INTEGRATED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR PORTFOLIO PROBLEM IN ENERGY SERVICE COMPANIES UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    Rabbani, Masoud
    Zahedifard, Sahar
    Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2018, 52 (04) : 305 - 322
  • [30] Judgment under uncertainty; a probabilistic evaluation framework for decision-making about sanitation systems in low-income countries
    Malekpour, Shirin
    Langeveld, Jeroen
    Letema, Sammy
    Clemens, Francois
    van Lier, Jules B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 118 : 106 - 114