Combination of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging with prostate-specific antigen density to stratify the risk of significant prostate cancer: Initial biopsy and long-term follow-up results

被引:3
|
作者
Konishi, Tsuzumi [1 ]
Washino, Satoshi [1 ]
Okochi, Tomohisa [2 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Jichi Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Saitama, Japan
关键词
biparametric magnetic resonance imaging; follow-up; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen density; MRI; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14948
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess whether the combination of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging with prostate-specific antigen density can properly stratify the risk of significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostate biopsies and how this approach affects the detection of prostate cancer during follow-up in patients who do not undergo prostate biopsy. Methods In total, 411 biopsy-naive patients who had elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and then underwent biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for suspicious prostate cancer were analyzed: 203 patients underwent prostate biopsies, whereas 208 patients did not. Significant prostate cancer detection rates stratified by the combination of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score and prostate-specific antigen density were assessed in patients who underwent prostate biopsies. The cumulative incidence of prostate cancer detection during the follow-up was assessed in patients who omitted biopsy. Results The negative predictive value for significant prostate cancer was 89% for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 1-3, which increased to 97% when prostate-specific antigen density <0.15 ng/ml/cm(3) was combined. Among patients who did not undergo biopsy, patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 1-3 plus prostate-specific antigen density <0.15 ng/ml/cm(3) included significantly less cases in which significant prostate cancer was detected during the follow-up, compared with the others (3.2% versus 17% at 36 months). Conclusions Restriction of prostate biopsies to patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 4-5 or prostate-specific antigen density >= 0.15 ng/ml/cm(3) proved to be the good biopsy strategy, effectively balancing risks and benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1037
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Men's Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy
    Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
    Pettersson, Christina
    Svensson, Linda
    Kohestani, Kimia
    Bratt, Karin Stinesen
    Wallstrom, Jonas
    Mansson, Marianne
    Hellstrom, Mikael
    Hugosson, Jonas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (03): : 553 - 562
  • [12] Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results
    Buisset, Julie
    Norris, Joseph M.
    Puech, Philippe
    Leroy, Xavier
    Ramdane, Nassima
    Drumez, Elodie
    Villers, Arnauld
    Olivier, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03) : 725 - 731
  • [13] Usefulness of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen Density in Pre-biopsy Detection of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer
    Sekito, Sho
    Terabe, Takashi
    Shibahara, Takuji
    Onishi, Takehisa
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (04) : 2183 - 2186
  • [14] Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men
    Knaapila, Juha
    Autio, Venla
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ettala, Otto
    Verho, Janne
    Kiyiniemi, Aida
    Taimen, Pekka
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [15] Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Shu
    Kozarek, Jason
    Russell, Ryan
    Drescher, Max
    Khan, Amir
    Kundra, Vikas
    Barry, Kathryn Hughes
    Naslund, Michael
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (02): : 189 - 203
  • [16] The impact of prostate volume estimation on the risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate-specific antigen density and magnetic resonance imaging score
    Baudewyns, Arthur
    Guenzel, Karsten
    Halinski, Adam
    Dariane, Charles
    Delavar, Gina
    Anract, Julien
    Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas
    Jabbour, Teddy
    Bourgeno, Henri-Alexandre
    Lefebvre, Yolene
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Fournier, Georges
    Oderda, Marco
    Gontero, Paolo
    Bernal-Gomez, Adrian
    Mastrorosa, Alessandro
    Roche, Jean-Baptiste
    Zahr, Rawad Abou
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Rysankova, Katerina
    Bui, Alexandre Patrick
    Taha, Fayek
    Windisch, Olivier
    Benamran, Daniel
    Vlahopoulos, Leonidas
    Assenmacher, Gregoire
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Diamand, Romain
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [17] Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Chiang, Chih-Hung
    Mok, Alex
    Zhang, Kai
    Hsieh, Po-Fan
    Zhu, Yao
    Lam, Wayne
    Tsang, Woon-Chau
    Fan, Yu-Hua
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Chan, Tsz-Yeung
    Leung, Chi-Ho
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Chu, Peggy Sau-Kwan
    Zhu, Gang
    Ye, Ding-Wei
    Wu, Hsi-Chin
    Tan, Teck-Wei
    Tsu, James Hok-Leung
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Chiong, Edmund
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (01) : 88 - 98
  • [18] Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Jambor, Ivan
    Lantz, Anna
    Ettala, Otto
    Stabile, Armando
    Taimen, Pekka
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Knaapila, Juha
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Martini, Alberto
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Picker, Wolfgang
    Haug, Erik
    Ratnani, Parita
    Haines, Kenneth
    Lewis, Sara
    Sujit, Nair
    Selvaggio, Oscar
    Sanguedolce, Francesca
    Macarini, Luca
    Cormio, Luigi
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Tewari, Ash
    Briganti, Alberto
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 971 - 979
  • [19] Use of Prostate Specific Antigen Density Combined with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Triage for Prostate Biopsy
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Adamcova, Vanda
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Minarik, Ivo
    Pavlicko, Adam
    Votrubova, Jana
    Babjuk, Marek
    Zachoval, Roman
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [20] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients
    Hu, Beibei
    Zhang, Huili
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Jin, Yongming
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)