Rasch Analysis of the Proactive Personality Scale

被引:6
作者
Teye-Kwadjo, Enoch [1 ,2 ]
de Bruin, Gideon P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Ind Psychol, Private Bag 11, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[2] Univ Ghana, Dept Psychol, Accra, Ghana
关键词
proactive personality; Rasch analysis; item response theory; classical test theory; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; JOB SEARCH; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; ENGAGEMENT; ATTITUDE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/00332941211028110
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Proactive Personality Scale (PPS) is used widely to measure proactive personality. Previous research has evaluated the psychometric properties of the 6-item PPS (hereafter called PPS-6) using classical test theory. There is a need to provide further validity evidence for the PPS-6 using modern test theory. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the PPS-6 using Rasch analysis. A total of 429 participants completed the PPS-6. Rasch rating scale model (RSM) was used to analyse the data. RSM showed that the PPS-6 fitted the Rasch model well. RSM demonstrated that the PPS-6 functioned as a unidimensional measure with good internal consistency reliability. Items on the PPS-6 did not show any noticeable differential item functioning across gender. RSM showed that the response rating scale of the PPS-6 is suitable. Results suggest that the PPS-6 is a reliable measure for the assessment of proactive personality.
引用
收藏
页码:2788 / 2806
页数:19
相关论文
共 71 条
[21]   DIMENSIONALITY OF THE 9-ITEM UTRECHT WORK ENGAGEMENT SCALE (UWES-9) [J].
de Bruin, Gideon P. ;
Henn, Carolina M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2013, 112 (03) :788-799
[22]   Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale [J].
Duncan, PW ;
Bode, RK ;
Lai, SM ;
Perera, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (07) :950-963
[23]   A Diagnostic Procedure to Detect Departures From Local Independence in Item Response Theory Models [J].
Edwards, Michael C. ;
Houts, Carrie R. ;
Cai, Li .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 23 (01) :138-149
[24]  
Embretson S. E., 2013, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
[25]   The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena [J].
Gerber, Alan S. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Doherty, David ;
Dowling, Conor M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 14, 2011, 14 :265-287
[26]  
Gerhardt M., 2009, Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, V16, P61, DOI [10.1177/1548051809334192, DOI 10.1177/1548051809334192]
[27]   A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains [J].
Gosling, SD ;
Rentfrow, PJ ;
Swann, WB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (06) :504-528
[28]   Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model [J].
Hagquist, Curt ;
Andrich, David .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
[29]  
Hattie J., 2015, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA, P437, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44016-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44016-X]
[30]  
Henn Carolina, 2019, SA j. ind. Psychol., V45, P1, DOI 10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1663