The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity

被引:31
|
作者
Chow, Michael [1 ]
Conway, Andrew R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Working memory; Working memory capacity; Individual differences; Visual arrays; Complex span; Intelligence; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; SPAN; REPRESENTATIONS; NUMBER; RESOLUTION; RESOURCES; PRECISION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-014-0496-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Working memory capacity is a strong positive predictor of many cognitive abilities, across various domains. The pattern of positive correlations across domains has been interpreted as evidence for a unitary source of inter-individual differences in behavior. However, recent work suggests that there are multiple sources of variance contributing to working memory capacity. The current study (N = 71) investigates individual differences in the scope and control of attention, in addition to the number and resolution of items maintained in working memory. Latent variable analyses indicate that the scope and control of attention reflect independent sources of variance and each account for unique variance in general intelligence. Also, estimates of the number of items maintained in working memory are consistent across tasks and related to general intelligence whereas estimates of resolution are task-dependent and not predictive of intelligence. These results provide insight into the structure of working memory, as well as intelligence, and raise new questions about the distinction between number and resolution in visual short-term memory.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 339
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity
    Nash Unsworth
    Matthew K. Robison
    Memory & Cognition, 2016, 44 : 188 - 196
  • [22] What is working memory capacity?
    Oberauer, Klaus
    ESTUDIOS DE PSICOLOGIA, 2017, 38 (02): : 338 - 384
  • [23] Are Individual Differences in Attention Control Related to Working Memory Capacity? A Latent Variable Mega-Analysis
    Unsworth, Nash
    Miller, Ashley L.
    Robison, Matthew K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2021, 150 (07) : 1332 - 1357
  • [24] The Relevance of Attention Control, Not Working Memory, in Human Factors
    Pak, Richard
    McLaughlin, Anne Collins
    Engle, Randall
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (05) : 1321 - 1332
  • [25] Cognitive Predictors of a Common Multitasking Ability: Contributions From Working Memory, Attention Control, and Fluid Intelligence
    Redick, Thomas S.
    Shipstead, Zach
    Meier, Matthew E.
    Montroy, Janelle J.
    Hicks, Kenny L.
    Unsworth, Nash
    Kane, Michael J.
    Hambrick, D. Zachary
    Engle, Randall W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2016, 145 (11) : 1473 - 1492
  • [26] Tone Series and the Nature of Working Memory Capacity Development
    Clark, Katherine M.
    Hardman, Kyle O.
    Schachtman, Todd R.
    Saults, J. Scott
    Glass, Bret A.
    Cowan, Nelson
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 54 (04) : 663 - 676
  • [27] Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence: Maintenance and Disengagement
    Shipstead, Zach
    Harrison, Tyler L.
    Engle, Randall W.
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (06) : 771 - 799
  • [28] Limitations of working memory capacity: The cognitive and social consequences
    Gruszka, Aleksandra
    Necka, Edward
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 35 (06) : 776 - 784
  • [29] The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness
    Kreitz, Carina
    Furley, Philip
    Memmert, Daniel
    Simons, Daniel J.
    PERCEPTION, 2016, 45 (04) : 386 - 399
  • [30] Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience
    Lambez, Bar
    Agmon, Galit
    Yahav, Paz Har-Shai
    Rassovsky, Yuri
    Golumbic, Elana Zion
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (07) : 3594 - 3605