Multidimensional impacts from international agricultural research: Implications for research priorities

被引:8
作者
Fuglie, Keith [1 ]
Wiebe, Keith [2 ]
Sulser, Timothy B. [2 ]
Cenacchi, Nicola [2 ]
Willenbockel, Dirk [3 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Agr, Econ Res Serv, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[2] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Washington, DC USA
[3] Inst Dev Studies, Brighton, England
关键词
agricultural productivity; CGIAR; impact assessment; parity model; IMPACT model; research and development (R&D); FOOD;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2022.1031562
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Investors in international agricultural research seek sustainable agri-food technologies that can potentially serve multiple objectives, including economic growth, food security, and sustainable use of natural resources. We employ quantitative economic models to examine the potential multi-dimensional impacts of agricultural productivity gains in the Global South. These models take into account behavior responses to agricultural technological change, i.e., how productivity changes may affect decisions on what to produce, trade, and consume. We compare potential impacts of productivity growth in different commodities and regions and assess implications along several impact dimensions, including economic and income growth, the population at risk of hunger, adequacy of protein and micronutrients in human diets, land and water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Potential impacts vary widely by commodity group and by region. These results reveal strengths and potential tradeoffs of different R&D spending allocations, and can help inform decision-making about an optimal R&D portfolio that takes into account the multiple objectives of agricultural investments.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Alston J.M., 2000, 113 INT FOOD POL RES
  • [2] Alston J. M., 2020, PAYOFF INVESTING CGI
  • [3] Alston J.M., 1995, Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting
  • [4] Effects of US Public Agricultural R&D on US Obesity and its Social Costs
    Alston, Julian M.
    MacEwan, Joanna P.
    Okrent, Abigail M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2016, 38 (03) : 492 - 520
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, World Development Indicators
  • [6] ASTI, 2022, AGR SCI TECHNOLOGY I
  • [7] Combining the effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on protein, iron, and zinc availability and projected climate change on global diets: a modelling study
    Beach, Robert H.
    Sulser, Timothy B.
    Crimmins, Allison
    Cenacchi, Nicola
    Cole, Jefferson
    Fukagawa, Naomi K.
    Mason-D'Croz, Daniel
    Myers, Samuel
    Sarofim, Marcus C.
    Smith, Matthew
    Ziska, Lewis H.
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2019, 3 (07) : E307 - E317
  • [8] FAOSTAT, 2021, AGR STAT TIM SER
  • [9] Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2008, FAO METH MEAS FOOD D
  • [10] Fuglie K., 2019, Harvesting prosperity: Technology and productivity growth in agriculture